Beste juridische AI-tools
Juridische AI leest contracten, zoekt rechtspraak en schrijft met bron. Harvey, Spellbook en CoCounsel zijn geen consumentenadvocaat. Kantoorprijzen zijn vaak maatwerk.
10 producten. Prijzen en teksten gecontroleerd op 5 oktober 2026.
Beste juridische AI-tools vergeleken
De prijs is het startbedrag dat de leverancier publiceert. Een gratis plan of proef staat er alleen als de prijspagina dat zegt.
| Product | Prijs | Gratis plan of proef | Functies | Integraties | Geschikt voor | Wat gebruikers zeggen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvey #1 | Not published | Niet vermeld | AI platform for law firms and in-house legal teams. | SAML SSO | Large law firms and corporate legal departments running high-stakes work on one platform. | Procesadvocaten op r/biglaw zeggen dat Harvey volstaat voor cliëntwerk als het kantoor geen publieke chatbot toestaat, en ze noemen nalezen en contradicties. Reddit |
| Legora #2 | Not published | Niet vermeld | Collaborative AI and an agentic operating system for legal work. | Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook | Law firms and in-house teams that want agentic workflows across research, review, and delivery. | Op r/legaltech zegt een vergelijking dat Legora voor een kleiner kantoor makkelijker leek dan Harvey. Reddit |
| Spellbook #3 | Not published | Proef | AI for contract review, drafting, and playbooks in Word. | Microsoft Word, Email, Slack | Law firms and in-house teams that negotiate contracts in Microsoft Word. | Een reactie op r/biglaw van iemand die Harvey verliet voor kleinere tools noemt Spellbook als een van de plekken waar die persoon landde. Reddit |
| Paxton #4 | $499 per user/month | Niet vermeld | Litigation workspace for matter files, research, and drafts. | DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook | Litigation attorneys and small firms that want research and drafts tied to the case file. | Geen geciteerde opmerking. |
| Clio #5 | From $49/user/mo | Proef | Legal practice management with AI on Core plans and above. | Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, QuickBooks, Xero | Law firms that want practice management, billing, and matter-aware AI in one system. | Geen geciteerde opmerking. |
| CoCounsel #6 | Not published | Niet vermeld | Thomson Reuters AI for legal, tax, audit, and compliance work. | Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint, Microsoft 365 | Firms and professional teams that want AI tied to Westlaw, Practical Law, or Checkpoint. | Dezelfde reactie op r/biglaw zet CoCounsel bij de kleinere tools die een Harvey-stoel vervingen voor dagelijks opstellen. Reddit |
| Lexis+ AI #7 | Not published | Proef | Legal AI for research, drafting, and analysis, now branded with Protégé. | Shepard's | Attorneys who want drafting and research grounded in LexisNexis authority and Shepard's. | Geen geciteerde opmerking. |
| Eve #8 | Not published | Niet vermeld | AI operating system for plaintiff law firms. | CMS | Personal injury and other plaintiff firms that want intake, medical review, and drafting in one system. | Geen geciteerde opmerking. |
| EvenUp #9 | Not published | Niet vermeld | Proactive AI across the personal-injury case lifecycle. | CMS | Personal injury firms that want demands, medical review, and negotiation support from case files. | Geen geciteerde opmerking. |
| Luminance #10 | Not published | Niet vermeld | Contract intelligence for legal, procurement, finance, and the wider enterprise. | None named on the pages we opened | Enterprises that want contract review and portfolio insight beyond the legal department. | Geen geciteerde opmerking. |
Ranglijst
De volgorde kijkt naar taakfit, autonomie, controle, integraties, toegang en hoe openbaar het product is.
| # | Agent | Geschikt voor | Prijs | Gratis plan | Autonomie | Integraties | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harvey | Large law firms and corporate legal departments running high-stakes work on one platform. | Not published | Nee | Semi-autonomous | SAML SSO | Uitsplitsing73
|
| 2 | Legora | Law firms and in-house teams that want agentic workflows across research, review, and delivery. | Not published | Nee | Semi-autonomous | Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook | Uitsplitsing73
|
| 3 | Spellbook | Law firms and in-house teams that negotiate contracts in Microsoft Word. | Not published | Proef | Semi-autonomous | Microsoft Word, Email, Slack | Uitsplitsing73
|
| 4 | Paxton | Litigation attorneys and small firms that want research and drafts tied to the case file. | $499 per user/month | Nee | Copilot | DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word +1 | Uitsplitsing72
|
| 5 | Clio | Law firms that want practice management, billing, and matter-aware AI in one system. | From $49/user/mo | Proef | Copilot | Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, QuickBooks +2 | Uitsplitsing72
|
| 6 | CoCounsel | Firms and professional teams that want AI tied to Westlaw, Practical Law, or Checkpoint. | Not published | Nee | Copilot | Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint +1 | Uitsplitsing70
|
| 7 | Lexis+ AI | Attorneys who want drafting and research grounded in LexisNexis authority and Shepard's. | Not published | Proef | Copilot | Shepard's | Uitsplitsing66
|
| 8 | Eve | Personal injury and other plaintiff firms that want intake, medical review, and drafting in one system. | Not published | Nee | Semi-autonomous | CMS | Uitsplitsing66
|
| 9 | EvenUp | Personal injury firms that want demands, medical review, and negotiation support from case files. | Not published | Nee | Semi-autonomous | CMS | Uitsplitsing65
|
| 10 | Luminance | Enterprises that want contract review and portfolio insight beyond the legal department. | Not published | Nee | Semi-autonomous | None named on the pages we opened | Uitsplitsing62
|
Plaats 1
Harvey73
Large law firms and corporate legal departments running high-stakes work on one platform.
- Prijs
- Not published
- Gratis plan
- Nee
- Autonomie
- Semi-autonomous
- Integraties
- SAML SSO
Uitsplitsing73
- Fit for the job29/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations6/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Plaats 2
Legora73
Law firms and in-house teams that want agentic workflows across research, review, and delivery.
- Prijs
- Not published
- Gratis plan
- Nee
- Autonomie
- Semi-autonomous
- Integraties
- Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook
Uitsplitsing73
- Fit for the job28/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations7/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Plaats 3
Spellbook73
Law firms and in-house teams that negotiate contracts in Microsoft Word.
- Prijs
- Not published
- Gratis plan
- Proef
- Autonomie
- Semi-autonomous
- Integraties
- Microsoft Word, Email, Slack
Uitsplitsing73
- Fit for the job27/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations8/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Plaats 4
Paxton72
Litigation attorneys and small firms that want research and drafts tied to the case file.
- Prijs
- $499 per user/month
- Gratis plan
- Nee
- Autonomie
- Copilot
- Integraties
- DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word
Uitsplitsing72
- Fit for the job24/30
- Autonomy9/20
- Controls13/15
- Integrations9/15
- Access8/10
- Evidence9/10
Plaats 5
Clio72
Law firms that want practice management, billing, and matter-aware AI in one system.
- Prijs
- From $49/user/mo
- Gratis plan
- Proef
- Autonomie
- Copilot
- Integraties
- Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, QuickBooks
Uitsplitsing72
- Fit for the job23/30
- Autonomy9/20
- Controls13/15
- Integrations10/15
- Access8/10
- Evidence9/10
Plaats 6
CoCounsel70
Firms and professional teams that want AI tied to Westlaw, Practical Law, or Checkpoint.
- Prijs
- Not published
- Gratis plan
- Nee
- Autonomie
- Copilot
- Integraties
- Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint
Uitsplitsing70
- Fit for the job26/30
- Autonomy9/20
- Controls13/15
- Integrations9/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Plaats 7
Lexis+ AI66
Attorneys who want drafting and research grounded in LexisNexis authority and Shepard's.
- Prijs
- Not published
- Gratis plan
- Proef
- Autonomie
- Copilot
- Integraties
- Shepard's
Uitsplitsing66
- Fit for the job25/30
- Autonomy9/20
- Controls13/15
- Integrations6/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Plaats 8
Eve66
Personal injury and other plaintiff firms that want intake, medical review, and drafting in one system.
- Prijs
- Not published
- Gratis plan
- Nee
- Autonomie
- Semi-autonomous
- Integraties
- CMS
Uitsplitsing66
- Fit for the job22/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations6/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Plaats 9
EvenUp65
Personal injury firms that want demands, medical review, and negotiation support from case files.
- Prijs
- Not published
- Gratis plan
- Nee
- Autonomie
- Semi-autonomous
- Integraties
- CMS
Uitsplitsing65
- Fit for the job21/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations6/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Plaats 10
Luminance62
Enterprises that want contract review and portfolio insight beyond the legal department.
- Prijs
- Not published
- Gratis plan
- Nee
- Autonomie
- Semi-autonomous
- Integraties
- None named on the pages we opened
Uitsplitsing62
- Fit for the job20/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations4/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Prijzen, functies en profielen
1
Harvey
Large law firms and corporate legal departments running high-stakes work on one platform.
Harvey is an AI platform for law firms and in-house teams, with agents, shared Spaces, a document Vault, contract intelligence, and a command center for usage. The site says more than 3,000 legal organizations use it and that default controls include SAML SSO, audit logs, IP allow-listing, and data lifecycle management.
- Prijs
- Not published
- No price, plan, or free trial is listed on the homepage opened. Access is presented through the product site rather than a public rate card. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Functies
- SAML SSO. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
Wat gebruikers zeggen
Procesadvocaten op r/biglaw zeggen dat Harvey volstaat voor cliëntwerk als het kantoor geen publieke chatbot toestaat, en ze noemen nalezen en contradicties.
Op r/legaltech zegt een pilotgebruiker dat de verkoop zwaar was en het product als een dunne laag op GPT voelde. De klacht is de prijs, niet een lijst ontbrekende functies.
“I find Harvey invaluable in my work (I’m a litigator). I think that ChatGPT performs better, but Harvey is more than good enough, and we’re not authorized to use public models with client materials.”
Reddit“For the price, complete bullshit. the sales team oversells like crazy, but under the hood it’s just a thin UI on top of GPT with a prompt sheet and some document storage.”
Reddit · u/tulumtimes2425
2
Legora
Law firms and in-house teams that want agentic workflows across research, review, and delivery.
Legora describes itself as collaborative AI for lawyers, with the Legora aOS connecting information, communication, and execution of legal work. Its Agent plans, executes, reviews, and delivers work, and the product list includes a Word add-in, Outlook add-in, tabular review, legal research, and a portal.
- Prijs
- Not published
- The homepage offers a demo and does not list a price, plan, free tier, or trial. The site cites SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, GDPR, and HIPAA, and says customer data is not used for AI training. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Functies
- Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
Wat gebruikers zeggen
Op r/legaltech zegt een vergelijking dat Legora voor een kleiner kantoor makkelijker leek dan Harvey.
Dezelfde reactie noemt het beperkter, en een andere zegt dat een groot kantoor het niet zou moeten kopen.
3
Spellbook
Law firms and in-house teams that negotiate contracts in Microsoft Word.
Spellbook reviews and drafts contracts and applies playbooks, with intake from email and Slack and a Word add-in plus an Associate multi-document agent. The company says it is trusted by 5,000+ legal teams and lists SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, and zero data retention with LLM providers.
- Prijs
- Not published
- Pricing is custom and based on the number of team members on the license. No dollar amount is published. A 7-day free trial is offered, with extended trials possible for larger organizations. Academic institutions can inquire about free access. Dedicated support is listed for teams over 10. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Functies
- Microsoft Word, Email, Slack. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
Wat gebruikers zeggen
Een reactie op r/biglaw van iemand die Harvey verliet voor kleinere tools noemt Spellbook als een van de plekken waar die persoon landde.
Die reactie beschrijft geen Spellbook-mislukking. Er staat dat je de uitvoer zelf nog moet nakijken.
“So I moved to smaller tools like Spellbook, AI Lawyer, and CoCounsel and it honestly felt like the same practical benefit with less fuss.”
Reddit
Prijs en functies van Spellbook/Alternatieven voor Spellbook
4
Paxton
Litigation attorneys and small firms that want research and drafts tied to the case file.
Paxton is AI for litigation teams that keeps the matter record, legal research, and drafting in one workspace, with citations to case files and authority. The site says it connects to a DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word, and Outlook, and that it is SOC 2, ISO, and HIPAA compliant.
- Prijs
- $499 per user/month
- Individual is $499 per user/month, or $2,999 per user/year, which the page says saves 50% compared with monthly. Enterprise is custom volume-based pricing with firm-wide access, onboarding, and an account manager. The Individual plan includes US federal regulations, state laws, and case law across all 50 states. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Functies
- DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.
5
Clio
Law firms that want practice management, billing, and matter-aware AI in one system.
Clio Manage is practice-management software for matters, documents, time, billing, trust accounting, and client payments. The pricing page says AI is included on Core and above, grounded in the firm's matters, and that firm data is not used to train AI.
- Prijs
- From $49/user/mo
- Clio's plans start at $49 USD per user per month. The four plans are Starter, Core, Signature, and Elite. Dollar prices above the $49 starting point were not listed on the page opened. AI features such as drafted bills, client updates, and scheduling are on Core and above. Accounting, including trust reconciliation, is included on every plan. Card payments are listed at 2.95% (3.75% American Express) and eCheck and ACH at 1%. The page title offers a free trial. Clio states SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, and 99.9% uptime. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Functies
- Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, QuickBooks, Xero, TrustBooks. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.
6
CoCounsel
Firms and professional teams that want AI tied to Westlaw, Practical Law, or Checkpoint.
CoCounsel is Thomson Reuters' AI for legal, tax, audit, compliance, and drafting work, grounded in its content and connected to Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint, Microsoft 365, and document-management partners. The company says customer content and prompts are not used to train CoCounsel or the underlying models, and that OpenAI and Google calls use zero-retention APIs.
- Prijs
- Not published
- The CoCounsel product page opened does not list a dollar price or a free trial. A separate Thomson Reuters sales page, seen in search but not opened, says online pricing is available only for new law-firm customers with up to 10 attorneys. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Functies
- Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint, Microsoft 365. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.
Wat gebruikers zeggen
Dezelfde reactie op r/biglaw zet CoCounsel bij de kleinere tools die een Harvey-stoel vervingen voor dagelijks opstellen.
In die thread lazen we geen aparte CoCounsel-mislukking. Het gedeelde punt is dat een mens de tekst nog nakijkt.
“Still have to review everything yourself either way.”
Reddit
Prijs en functies van CoCounsel/Alternatieven voor CoCounsel
7
Lexis+ AI
Attorneys who want drafting and research grounded in LexisNexis authority and Shepard's.
The Lexis+ with Protégé free-trial page, which describes the product formerly presented as Lexis+ AI, says it accelerates research, drafting, and analysis grounded in LexisNexis content and Shepard's citations. It also says general AI and legal AI can be used together in one secure workspace.
- Prijs
- Not published
- The original product URL returned HTTP 403. The free-trial page that did open invites a Lexis+ with Protégé trial and does not list a price or trial length. A subscription dollar amount was not verified. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Functies
- Shepard's. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.
Prijs en functies van Lexis+ AI/Alternatieven voor Lexis+ AI
8
Eve
Personal injury and other plaintiff firms that want intake, medical review, and drafting in one system.
EveOS is an AI operating system for plaintiff law firms, covering intake, medical chronologies, demand letters, discovery, research, and a nightly auditor that reviews active matters. Eve says it is trusted by 1,200+ firms, is SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA compliant, and does not use case data to train shared models.
- Prijs
- Not published
- The homepage offers a demo and a call. No dollar price, free tier, or trial length is listed. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Functies
- CMS. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
9
EvenUp
Personal injury firms that want demands, medical review, and negotiation support from case files.
EvenUp is AI for personal injury firms covering intake, treatment tracking, demands, negotiation, discovery, and trial prep. The site says demands can be instant AI drafts or legal-reviewed drafts, cites a 250K+ verdict and settlement dataset, and says the company is SOC 2-audited and HIPAA-attested.
- Prijs
- Not published
- No price, free tier, or trial is listed on the homepage opened. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Functies
- CMS. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
10
Luminance
Enterprises that want contract review and portfolio insight beyond the legal department.
Luminance is a contract-intelligence platform for negotiating with playbooks, discovering risk and obligations across a portfolio, and automating workflows from intake to signature. It says it is used by 1,000+ enterprises and lists ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II.
- Prijs
- Not published
- The homepage offers a demo and does not list a price, free tier, or trial. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Functies
- None named on the pages we opened. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
Prijs en functies van Luminance/Alternatieven voor Luminance
Wat is een AI-agent?
Juridische AI leest contracten, zoekt rechtspraak en schrijft met bron. Harvey, Spellbook en CoCounsel zijn geen consumentenadvocaat. Kantoorprijzen zijn vaak maatwerk.
Hoe deze lijst is opgebouwd
Bovenaan deze lijst staan Harvey, Legora, Spellbook. De volgorde volgt de gepubliceerde score, geen advertentie.
Wat je vergelijkt
Kijk naar de taak, de startprijs en of een mens het resultaat nog goedkeurt.
- Een taak die het product echt doet
- Een gepubliceerde prijs, een gratis plan of een duidelijk genoemde maatwerkprijs
- Een controle voordat het werk de klant bereikt
Waar deze software voor is
Ze helpt als dezelfde stap terugkomt. De beslissing blijft bij een mens.
- De startprijs zien vóór een demo
- Producten voor deze taak vergelijken, geen algemeen chatvenster
- De productpagina openen voor de langere notities
Voor wie deze lijst is
Voor mensen die de taak al kennen en de producten willen die hem doen, met een datum bij de prijzen.
Gepubliceerde startprijzen
Startcijfers die we konden controleren: Harvey (Not published), Legora (Not published), Spellbook (Not published). Gecontroleerd op 5 oktober 2026.
Hoe je kiest
Stem eerst de taak af. Lees daarna voor wie het product is en of je zonder verkoopgesprek kunt starten.
Verwante categorieën
Naburige taken hebben een eigen lijst.
Veelgestelde vragen
Scoringsmethode
Gecontroleerd 5 October 2026
Elk product krijgt een score op 100 op dezelfde zes delen. De plaats volgt het totaal, dan de geschiktheid, dan de naam. Lees de volledige methode.