Meilleurs outils d'IA juridique
L'IA juridique relit des contrats, cherche la jurisprudence et rédige avec citation. Harvey, Spellbook et CoCounsel ne sont pas un avocat grand public. Le prix cabinet est souvent sur devis.
10 produits. Prix et fiches vérifiés le 5 octobre 2026.
Meilleurs outils d'IA juridique comparés
Le prix est le tarif d'entrée publié par l'éditeur. Une offre gratuite ou un essai n'apparaît que si la page des prix le dit.
| Produit | Prix | Offre gratuite ou essai | Fonctions | Intégrations | Pour qui | Ce qu'on en dit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvey #1 | Not published | Non indiqué | AI platform for law firms and in-house legal teams. | SAML SSO | Large law firms and corporate legal departments running high-stakes work on one platform. | Des plaideurs sur r/biglaw disent que Harvey suffit pour le travail client quand le cabinet interdit un chatbot public, et ils citent la relecture et la détection de contradictions. Reddit |
| Legora #2 | Not published | Non indiqué | Collaborative AI and an agentic operating system for legal work. | Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook | Law firms and in-house teams that want agentic workflows across research, review, and delivery. | Sur r/legaltech, une comparaison dit que Legora semblait plus simple que Harvey pour un petit cabinet. Reddit |
| Spellbook #3 | Not published | Essai | AI for contract review, drafting, and playbooks in Word. | Microsoft Word, Email, Slack | Law firms and in-house teams that negotiate contracts in Microsoft Word. | Un commentaire sur r/biglaw, de quelqu’un qui a quitté Harvey pour de plus petits outils, cite Spellbook parmi les endroits où il a atterri. Reddit |
| Paxton #4 | $499 per user/month | Non indiqué | Litigation workspace for matter files, research, and drafts. | DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook | Litigation attorneys and small firms that want research and drafts tied to the case file. | Pas de citation sourcée. |
| Clio #5 | From $49/user/mo | Essai | Legal practice management with AI on Core plans and above. | Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, QuickBooks, Xero | Law firms that want practice management, billing, and matter-aware AI in one system. | Pas de citation sourcée. |
| CoCounsel #6 | Not published | Non indiqué | Thomson Reuters AI for legal, tax, audit, and compliance work. | Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint, Microsoft 365 | Firms and professional teams that want AI tied to Westlaw, Practical Law, or Checkpoint. | Le même commentaire sur r/biglaw range CoCounsel avec les outils plus petits qui ont remplacé un siège Harvey pour la rédaction quotidienne. Reddit |
| Lexis+ AI #7 | Not published | Essai | Legal AI for research, drafting, and analysis, now branded with Protégé. | Shepard's | Attorneys who want drafting and research grounded in LexisNexis authority and Shepard's. | Pas de citation sourcée. |
| Eve #8 | Not published | Non indiqué | AI operating system for plaintiff law firms. | CMS | Personal injury and other plaintiff firms that want intake, medical review, and drafting in one system. | Pas de citation sourcée. |
| EvenUp #9 | Not published | Non indiqué | Proactive AI across the personal-injury case lifecycle. | CMS | Personal injury firms that want demands, medical review, and negotiation support from case files. | Pas de citation sourcée. |
| Luminance #10 | Not published | Non indiqué | Contract intelligence for legal, procurement, finance, and the wider enterprise. | None named on the pages we opened | Enterprises that want contract review and portfolio insight beyond the legal department. | Pas de citation sourcée. |
Classement
L'ordre regarde l'adéquation au travail, l'autonomie, les contrôles, les intégrations, l'accès et le caractère public du produit.
| # | Agent | Pour qui | Prix | Offre gratuite | Autonomie | Intégrations | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harvey | Large law firms and corporate legal departments running high-stakes work on one platform. | Not published | Non | Semi-autonomous | SAML SSO | Détail de la note73
|
| 2 | Legora | Law firms and in-house teams that want agentic workflows across research, review, and delivery. | Not published | Non | Semi-autonomous | Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook | Détail de la note73
|
| 3 | Spellbook | Law firms and in-house teams that negotiate contracts in Microsoft Word. | Not published | Essai | Semi-autonomous | Microsoft Word, Email, Slack | Détail de la note73
|
| 4 | Paxton | Litigation attorneys and small firms that want research and drafts tied to the case file. | $499 per user/month | Non | Copilot | DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word +1 | Détail de la note72
|
| 5 | Clio | Law firms that want practice management, billing, and matter-aware AI in one system. | From $49/user/mo | Essai | Copilot | Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, QuickBooks +2 | Détail de la note72
|
| 6 | CoCounsel | Firms and professional teams that want AI tied to Westlaw, Practical Law, or Checkpoint. | Not published | Non | Copilot | Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint +1 | Détail de la note70
|
| 7 | Lexis+ AI | Attorneys who want drafting and research grounded in LexisNexis authority and Shepard's. | Not published | Essai | Copilot | Shepard's | Détail de la note66
|
| 8 | Eve | Personal injury and other plaintiff firms that want intake, medical review, and drafting in one system. | Not published | Non | Semi-autonomous | CMS | Détail de la note66
|
| 9 | EvenUp | Personal injury firms that want demands, medical review, and negotiation support from case files. | Not published | Non | Semi-autonomous | CMS | Détail de la note65
|
| 10 | Luminance | Enterprises that want contract review and portfolio insight beyond the legal department. | Not published | Non | Semi-autonomous | None named on the pages we opened | Détail de la note62
|
Rang 1
Harvey73
Large law firms and corporate legal departments running high-stakes work on one platform.
- Prix
- Not published
- Offre gratuite
- Non
- Autonomie
- Semi-autonomous
- Intégrations
- SAML SSO
Détail de la note73
- Fit for the job29/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations6/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Rang 2
Legora73
Law firms and in-house teams that want agentic workflows across research, review, and delivery.
- Prix
- Not published
- Offre gratuite
- Non
- Autonomie
- Semi-autonomous
- Intégrations
- Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook
Détail de la note73
- Fit for the job28/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations7/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Rang 3
Spellbook73
Law firms and in-house teams that negotiate contracts in Microsoft Word.
- Prix
- Not published
- Offre gratuite
- Essai
- Autonomie
- Semi-autonomous
- Intégrations
- Microsoft Word, Email, Slack
Détail de la note73
- Fit for the job27/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations8/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Rang 4
Paxton72
Litigation attorneys and small firms that want research and drafts tied to the case file.
- Prix
- $499 per user/month
- Offre gratuite
- Non
- Autonomie
- Copilot
- Intégrations
- DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word
Détail de la note72
- Fit for the job24/30
- Autonomy9/20
- Controls13/15
- Integrations9/15
- Access8/10
- Evidence9/10
Rang 5
Clio72
Law firms that want practice management, billing, and matter-aware AI in one system.
- Prix
- From $49/user/mo
- Offre gratuite
- Essai
- Autonomie
- Copilot
- Intégrations
- Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, QuickBooks
Détail de la note72
- Fit for the job23/30
- Autonomy9/20
- Controls13/15
- Integrations10/15
- Access8/10
- Evidence9/10
Rang 6
CoCounsel70
Firms and professional teams that want AI tied to Westlaw, Practical Law, or Checkpoint.
- Prix
- Not published
- Offre gratuite
- Non
- Autonomie
- Copilot
- Intégrations
- Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint
Détail de la note70
- Fit for the job26/30
- Autonomy9/20
- Controls13/15
- Integrations9/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Rang 7
Lexis+ AI66
Attorneys who want drafting and research grounded in LexisNexis authority and Shepard's.
- Prix
- Not published
- Offre gratuite
- Essai
- Autonomie
- Copilot
- Intégrations
- Shepard's
Détail de la note66
- Fit for the job25/30
- Autonomy9/20
- Controls13/15
- Integrations6/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Rang 8
Eve66
Personal injury and other plaintiff firms that want intake, medical review, and drafting in one system.
- Prix
- Not published
- Offre gratuite
- Non
- Autonomie
- Semi-autonomous
- Intégrations
- CMS
Détail de la note66
- Fit for the job22/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations6/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Rang 9
EvenUp65
Personal injury firms that want demands, medical review, and negotiation support from case files.
- Prix
- Not published
- Offre gratuite
- Non
- Autonomie
- Semi-autonomous
- Intégrations
- CMS
Détail de la note65
- Fit for the job21/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations6/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Rang 10
Luminance62
Enterprises that want contract review and portfolio insight beyond the legal department.
- Prix
- Not published
- Offre gratuite
- Non
- Autonomie
- Semi-autonomous
- Intégrations
- None named on the pages we opened
Détail de la note62
- Fit for the job20/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations4/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Prix, fonctions et fiches
1
Harvey
Large law firms and corporate legal departments running high-stakes work on one platform.
Harvey is an AI platform for law firms and in-house teams, with agents, shared Spaces, a document Vault, contract intelligence, and a command center for usage. The site says more than 3,000 legal organizations use it and that default controls include SAML SSO, audit logs, IP allow-listing, and data lifecycle management.
- Prix
- Not published
- No price, plan, or free trial is listed on the homepage opened. Access is presented through the product site rather than a public rate card. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Fonctions
- SAML SSO. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
Ce qu'on en dit
Des plaideurs sur r/biglaw disent que Harvey suffit pour le travail client quand le cabinet interdit un chatbot public, et ils citent la relecture et la détection de contradictions.
Sur r/legaltech, un utilisateur de pilote dit que la vente était lourde et que le produit semblait une fine interface sur GPT. La plainte est le prix, pas une liste de fonctions manquantes.
“I find Harvey invaluable in my work (I’m a litigator). I think that ChatGPT performs better, but Harvey is more than good enough, and we’re not authorized to use public models with client materials.”
Reddit“For the price, complete bullshit. the sales team oversells like crazy, but under the hood it’s just a thin UI on top of GPT with a prompt sheet and some document storage.”
Reddit · u/tulumtimes2425
2
Legora
Law firms and in-house teams that want agentic workflows across research, review, and delivery.
Legora describes itself as collaborative AI for lawyers, with the Legora aOS connecting information, communication, and execution of legal work. Its Agent plans, executes, reviews, and delivers work, and the product list includes a Word add-in, Outlook add-in, tabular review, legal research, and a portal.
- Prix
- Not published
- The homepage offers a demo and does not list a price, plan, free tier, or trial. The site cites SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, GDPR, and HIPAA, and says customer data is not used for AI training. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Fonctions
- Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
Ce qu'on en dit
Sur r/legaltech, une comparaison dit que Legora semblait plus simple que Harvey pour un petit cabinet.
Le même commentaire le juge plus limité, et un autre dit que ce n’est pas ce qu’un grand cabinet devrait acheter.
3
Spellbook
Law firms and in-house teams that negotiate contracts in Microsoft Word.
Spellbook reviews and drafts contracts and applies playbooks, with intake from email and Slack and a Word add-in plus an Associate multi-document agent. The company says it is trusted by 5,000+ legal teams and lists SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, and zero data retention with LLM providers.
- Prix
- Not published
- Pricing is custom and based on the number of team members on the license. No dollar amount is published. A 7-day free trial is offered, with extended trials possible for larger organizations. Academic institutions can inquire about free access. Dedicated support is listed for teams over 10. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Fonctions
- Microsoft Word, Email, Slack. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
Ce qu'on en dit
Un commentaire sur r/biglaw, de quelqu’un qui a quitté Harvey pour de plus petits outils, cite Spellbook parmi les endroits où il a atterri.
Ce commentaire ne décrit pas un échec de Spellbook. Il dit qu’il faut encore relire le résultat soi-même.
“So I moved to smaller tools like Spellbook, AI Lawyer, and CoCounsel and it honestly felt like the same practical benefit with less fuss.”
Reddit
4
Paxton
Litigation attorneys and small firms that want research and drafts tied to the case file.
Paxton is AI for litigation teams that keeps the matter record, legal research, and drafting in one workspace, with citations to case files and authority. The site says it connects to a DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word, and Outlook, and that it is SOC 2, ISO, and HIPAA compliant.
- Prix
- $499 per user/month
- Individual is $499 per user/month, or $2,999 per user/year, which the page says saves 50% compared with monthly. Enterprise is custom volume-based pricing with firm-wide access, onboarding, and an account manager. The Individual plan includes US federal regulations, state laws, and case law across all 50 states. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Fonctions
- DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.
5
Clio
Law firms that want practice management, billing, and matter-aware AI in one system.
Clio Manage is practice-management software for matters, documents, time, billing, trust accounting, and client payments. The pricing page says AI is included on Core and above, grounded in the firm's matters, and that firm data is not used to train AI.
- Prix
- From $49/user/mo
- Clio's plans start at $49 USD per user per month. The four plans are Starter, Core, Signature, and Elite. Dollar prices above the $49 starting point were not listed on the page opened. AI features such as drafted bills, client updates, and scheduling are on Core and above. Accounting, including trust reconciliation, is included on every plan. Card payments are listed at 2.95% (3.75% American Express) and eCheck and ACH at 1%. The page title offers a free trial. Clio states SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, and 99.9% uptime. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Fonctions
- Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, QuickBooks, Xero, TrustBooks. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.
6
CoCounsel
Firms and professional teams that want AI tied to Westlaw, Practical Law, or Checkpoint.
CoCounsel is Thomson Reuters' AI for legal, tax, audit, compliance, and drafting work, grounded in its content and connected to Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint, Microsoft 365, and document-management partners. The company says customer content and prompts are not used to train CoCounsel or the underlying models, and that OpenAI and Google calls use zero-retention APIs.
- Prix
- Not published
- The CoCounsel product page opened does not list a dollar price or a free trial. A separate Thomson Reuters sales page, seen in search but not opened, says online pricing is available only for new law-firm customers with up to 10 attorneys. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Fonctions
- Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint, Microsoft 365. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.
Ce qu'on en dit
Le même commentaire sur r/biglaw range CoCounsel avec les outils plus petits qui ont remplacé un siège Harvey pour la rédaction quotidienne.
Dans ce fil, nous n’avons pas lu un échec distinct de CoCounsel. Le point commun est qu’une personne relit encore le brouillon.
“Still have to review everything yourself either way.”
Reddit
7
Lexis+ AI
Attorneys who want drafting and research grounded in LexisNexis authority and Shepard's.
The Lexis+ with Protégé free-trial page, which describes the product formerly presented as Lexis+ AI, says it accelerates research, drafting, and analysis grounded in LexisNexis content and Shepard's citations. It also says general AI and legal AI can be used together in one secure workspace.
- Prix
- Not published
- The original product URL returned HTTP 403. The free-trial page that did open invites a Lexis+ with Protégé trial and does not list a price or trial length. A subscription dollar amount was not verified. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Fonctions
- Shepard's. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.
8
Eve
Personal injury and other plaintiff firms that want intake, medical review, and drafting in one system.
EveOS is an AI operating system for plaintiff law firms, covering intake, medical chronologies, demand letters, discovery, research, and a nightly auditor that reviews active matters. Eve says it is trusted by 1,200+ firms, is SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA compliant, and does not use case data to train shared models.
- Prix
- Not published
- The homepage offers a demo and a call. No dollar price, free tier, or trial length is listed. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Fonctions
- CMS. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
9
EvenUp
Personal injury firms that want demands, medical review, and negotiation support from case files.
EvenUp is AI for personal injury firms covering intake, treatment tracking, demands, negotiation, discovery, and trial prep. The site says demands can be instant AI drafts or legal-reviewed drafts, cites a 250K+ verdict and settlement dataset, and says the company is SOC 2-audited and HIPAA-attested.
- Prix
- Not published
- No price, free tier, or trial is listed on the homepage opened. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Fonctions
- CMS. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
10
Luminance
Enterprises that want contract review and portfolio insight beyond the legal department.
Luminance is a contract-intelligence platform for negotiating with playbooks, discovering risk and obligations across a portfolio, and automating workflows from intake to signature. It says it is used by 1,000+ enterprises and lists ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II.
- Prix
- Not published
- The homepage offers a demo and does not list a price, free tier, or trial. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Fonctions
- None named on the pages we opened. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
Qu'est-ce qu'un agent IA ?
L'IA juridique relit des contrats, cherche la jurisprudence et rédige avec citation. Harvey, Spellbook et CoCounsel ne sont pas un avocat grand public. Le prix cabinet est souvent sur devis.
Comment cette liste est organisée
En tête de cette liste : Harvey, Legora, Spellbook. L'ordre suit la note publiée, pas une publicité.
Quoi comparer
Regardez le métier, le prix d'entrée, et si une personne valide encore le résultat.
- Un métier que le produit fait vraiment
- Un prix publié, une offre gratuite, ou un prix sur devis dit clairement
- Une relecture avant que le travail n'arrive au client
À quoi sert ce type de logiciel
Il sert quand la même étape se répète. La décision reste à une personne.
- Voir le prix d'entrée avant une démo
- Comparer des produits de ce métier, pas une fenêtre de chat générale
- Ouvrir la fiche pour les notes plus longues
À qui s'adresse cette liste
À ceux qui connaissent déjà le métier et veulent les produits qui le font, avec une date sur les prix.
Prix d'entrée publiés
Chiffres d'entrée que nous avons pu vérifier : Harvey (Not published), Legora (Not published), Spellbook (Not published). Contrôle du 5 octobre 2026.
Comment choisir
Faites d'abord correspondre le métier. Ensuite, lisez pour qui est le produit et s'il est possible de commencer sans appel commercial.
Catégories proches
Les métiers voisins ont leur propre liste.
Questions fréquentes
Méthode de notation
Vérifié 5 October 2026
Chaque produit est noté sur 100 avec les mêmes six parties. Le rang suit le total, puis l'adéquation, puis le nom. Lire la méthode complète.