Mejores herramientas de IA jurídica
La IA jurídica revisa contratos, busca jurisprudencia y redacta con cita. Harvey, Spellbook y CoCounsel no son un abogado de consumo. Los precios de bufete suelen ser a medida.
10 productos. Precios y fichas revisados el 5 de octubre de 2026.
Mejores herramientas de IA jurídica comparados
El precio es la cifra de salida que publica el proveedor. El plan gratis o la prueba aparecen solo si la página de precios lo dice.
| Producto | Precio | Plan gratis o prueba | Funciones | Integraciones | Para quién | Qué dicen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvey #1 | Not published | No figura | AI platform for law firms and in-house legal teams. | SAML SSO | Large law firms and corporate legal departments running high-stakes work on one platform. | Litigantes en r/biglaw dicen que Harvey basta para trabajo de cliente cuando el despacho no permite un chatbot público, y mencionan revisión y detección de contradicciones. Reddit |
| Legora #2 | Not published | No figura | Collaborative AI and an agentic operating system for legal work. | Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook | Law firms and in-house teams that want agentic workflows across research, review, and delivery. | En r/legaltech, una comparación dice que Legora parecía más fácil que Harvey para un despacho pequeño. Reddit |
| Spellbook #3 | Not published | Prueba | AI for contract review, drafting, and playbooks in Word. | Microsoft Word, Email, Slack | Law firms and in-house teams that negotiate contracts in Microsoft Word. | Un comentario de r/biglaw que dejó Harvey por herramientas más pequeñas nombra Spellbook como uno de los sitios donde aterrizó. Reddit |
| Paxton #4 | $499 per user/month | No figura | Litigation workspace for matter files, research, and drafts. | DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook | Litigation attorneys and small firms that want research and drafts tied to the case file. | Sin comentarios citados. |
| Clio #5 | From $49/user/mo | Prueba | Legal practice management with AI on Core plans and above. | Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, QuickBooks, Xero | Law firms that want practice management, billing, and matter-aware AI in one system. | Sin comentarios citados. |
| CoCounsel #6 | Not published | No figura | Thomson Reuters AI for legal, tax, audit, and compliance work. | Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint, Microsoft 365 | Firms and professional teams that want AI tied to Westlaw, Practical Law, or Checkpoint. | El mismo comentario de r/biglaw agrupa CoCounsel con las herramientas más pequeñas que reemplazaron un puesto de Harvey para la redacción diaria. Reddit |
| Lexis+ AI #7 | Not published | Prueba | Legal AI for research, drafting, and analysis, now branded with Protégé. | Shepard's | Attorneys who want drafting and research grounded in LexisNexis authority and Shepard's. | Sin comentarios citados. |
| Eve #8 | Not published | No figura | AI operating system for plaintiff law firms. | CMS | Personal injury and other plaintiff firms that want intake, medical review, and drafting in one system. | Sin comentarios citados. |
| EvenUp #9 | Not published | No figura | Proactive AI across the personal-injury case lifecycle. | CMS | Personal injury firms that want demands, medical review, and negotiation support from case files. | Sin comentarios citados. |
| Luminance #10 | Not published | No figura | Contract intelligence for legal, procurement, finance, and the wider enterprise. | None named on the pages we opened | Enterprises that want contract review and portfolio insight beyond the legal department. | Sin comentarios citados. |
Lista ordenada
El orden mira el encaje con el trabajo, la autonomía, los controles, las integraciones, el acceso y lo público que es el producto.
| # | Agente | Para quién | Precio | Plan gratis | Autonomía | Integraciones | Puntuación |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harvey | Large law firms and corporate legal departments running high-stakes work on one platform. | Not published | No | Semi-autonomous | SAML SSO | Desglose73
|
| 2 | Legora | Law firms and in-house teams that want agentic workflows across research, review, and delivery. | Not published | No | Semi-autonomous | Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook | Desglose73
|
| 3 | Spellbook | Law firms and in-house teams that negotiate contracts in Microsoft Word. | Not published | Prueba | Semi-autonomous | Microsoft Word, Email, Slack | Desglose73
|
| 4 | Paxton | Litigation attorneys and small firms that want research and drafts tied to the case file. | $499 per user/month | No | Copilot | DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word +1 | Desglose72
|
| 5 | Clio | Law firms that want practice management, billing, and matter-aware AI in one system. | From $49/user/mo | Prueba | Copilot | Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, QuickBooks +2 | Desglose72
|
| 6 | CoCounsel | Firms and professional teams that want AI tied to Westlaw, Practical Law, or Checkpoint. | Not published | No | Copilot | Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint +1 | Desglose70
|
| 7 | Lexis+ AI | Attorneys who want drafting and research grounded in LexisNexis authority and Shepard's. | Not published | Prueba | Copilot | Shepard's | Desglose66
|
| 8 | Eve | Personal injury and other plaintiff firms that want intake, medical review, and drafting in one system. | Not published | No | Semi-autonomous | CMS | Desglose66
|
| 9 | EvenUp | Personal injury firms that want demands, medical review, and negotiation support from case files. | Not published | No | Semi-autonomous | CMS | Desglose65
|
| 10 | Luminance | Enterprises that want contract review and portfolio insight beyond the legal department. | Not published | No | Semi-autonomous | None named on the pages we opened | Desglose62
|
Puesto 1
Harvey73
Large law firms and corporate legal departments running high-stakes work on one platform.
- Precio
- Not published
- Plan gratis
- No
- Autonomía
- Semi-autonomous
- Integraciones
- SAML SSO
Desglose73
- Fit for the job29/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations6/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Puesto 2
Legora73
Law firms and in-house teams that want agentic workflows across research, review, and delivery.
- Precio
- Not published
- Plan gratis
- No
- Autonomía
- Semi-autonomous
- Integraciones
- Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook
Desglose73
- Fit for the job28/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations7/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Puesto 3
Spellbook73
Law firms and in-house teams that negotiate contracts in Microsoft Word.
- Precio
- Not published
- Plan gratis
- Prueba
- Autonomía
- Semi-autonomous
- Integraciones
- Microsoft Word, Email, Slack
Desglose73
- Fit for the job27/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations8/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Puesto 4
Paxton72
Litigation attorneys and small firms that want research and drafts tied to the case file.
- Precio
- $499 per user/month
- Plan gratis
- No
- Autonomía
- Copilot
- Integraciones
- DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word
Desglose72
- Fit for the job24/30
- Autonomy9/20
- Controls13/15
- Integrations9/15
- Access8/10
- Evidence9/10
Puesto 5
Clio72
Law firms that want practice management, billing, and matter-aware AI in one system.
- Precio
- From $49/user/mo
- Plan gratis
- Prueba
- Autonomía
- Copilot
- Integraciones
- Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, QuickBooks
Desglose72
- Fit for the job23/30
- Autonomy9/20
- Controls13/15
- Integrations10/15
- Access8/10
- Evidence9/10
Puesto 6
CoCounsel70
Firms and professional teams that want AI tied to Westlaw, Practical Law, or Checkpoint.
- Precio
- Not published
- Plan gratis
- No
- Autonomía
- Copilot
- Integraciones
- Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint
Desglose70
- Fit for the job26/30
- Autonomy9/20
- Controls13/15
- Integrations9/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Puesto 7
Lexis+ AI66
Attorneys who want drafting and research grounded in LexisNexis authority and Shepard's.
- Precio
- Not published
- Plan gratis
- Prueba
- Autonomía
- Copilot
- Integraciones
- Shepard's
Desglose66
- Fit for the job25/30
- Autonomy9/20
- Controls13/15
- Integrations6/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Puesto 8
Eve66
Personal injury and other plaintiff firms that want intake, medical review, and drafting in one system.
- Precio
- Not published
- Plan gratis
- No
- Autonomía
- Semi-autonomous
- Integraciones
- CMS
Desglose66
- Fit for the job22/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations6/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Puesto 9
EvenUp65
Personal injury firms that want demands, medical review, and negotiation support from case files.
- Precio
- Not published
- Plan gratis
- No
- Autonomía
- Semi-autonomous
- Integraciones
- CMS
Desglose65
- Fit for the job21/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations6/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Puesto 10
Luminance62
Enterprises that want contract review and portfolio insight beyond the legal department.
- Precio
- Not published
- Plan gratis
- No
- Autonomía
- Semi-autonomous
- Integraciones
- None named on the pages we opened
Desglose62
- Fit for the job20/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations4/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Precios, funciones y fichas
1
Harvey
Large law firms and corporate legal departments running high-stakes work on one platform.
Harvey is an AI platform for law firms and in-house teams, with agents, shared Spaces, a document Vault, contract intelligence, and a command center for usage. The site says more than 3,000 legal organizations use it and that default controls include SAML SSO, audit logs, IP allow-listing, and data lifecycle management.
- Precio
- Not published
- No price, plan, or free trial is listed on the homepage opened. Access is presented through the product site rather than a public rate card. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funciones
- SAML SSO. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
Qué dicen
Litigantes en r/biglaw dicen que Harvey basta para trabajo de cliente cuando el despacho no permite un chatbot público, y mencionan revisión y detección de contradicciones.
En r/legaltech, quien hizo una prueba dice que la venta fue pesada y que el producto parecía una capa fina sobre GPT. La queja es el precio, no una lista de funciones que falten.
“I find Harvey invaluable in my work (I’m a litigator). I think that ChatGPT performs better, but Harvey is more than good enough, and we’re not authorized to use public models with client materials.”
Reddit“For the price, complete bullshit. the sales team oversells like crazy, but under the hood it’s just a thin UI on top of GPT with a prompt sheet and some document storage.”
Reddit · u/tulumtimes2425
2
Legora
Law firms and in-house teams that want agentic workflows across research, review, and delivery.
Legora describes itself as collaborative AI for lawyers, with the Legora aOS connecting information, communication, and execution of legal work. Its Agent plans, executes, reviews, and delivers work, and the product list includes a Word add-in, Outlook add-in, tabular review, legal research, and a portal.
- Precio
- Not published
- The homepage offers a demo and does not list a price, plan, free tier, or trial. The site cites SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, GDPR, and HIPAA, and says customer data is not used for AI training. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funciones
- Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
Qué dicen
En r/legaltech, una comparación dice que Legora parecía más fácil que Harvey para un despacho pequeño.
El mismo comentario lo llama más limitado, y otro dice que no es lo que debería comprar un despacho grande.
3
Spellbook
Law firms and in-house teams that negotiate contracts in Microsoft Word.
Spellbook reviews and drafts contracts and applies playbooks, with intake from email and Slack and a Word add-in plus an Associate multi-document agent. The company says it is trusted by 5,000+ legal teams and lists SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, and zero data retention with LLM providers.
- Precio
- Not published
- Pricing is custom and based on the number of team members on the license. No dollar amount is published. A 7-day free trial is offered, with extended trials possible for larger organizations. Academic institutions can inquire about free access. Dedicated support is listed for teams over 10. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funciones
- Microsoft Word, Email, Slack. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
Qué dicen
Un comentario de r/biglaw que dejó Harvey por herramientas más pequeñas nombra Spellbook como uno de los sitios donde aterrizó.
Ese comentario no describe un fallo de Spellbook. Dice que igual hay que revisar uno mismo el resultado.
“So I moved to smaller tools like Spellbook, AI Lawyer, and CoCounsel and it honestly felt like the same practical benefit with less fuss.”
Reddit
4
Paxton
Litigation attorneys and small firms that want research and drafts tied to the case file.
Paxton is AI for litigation teams that keeps the matter record, legal research, and drafting in one workspace, with citations to case files and authority. The site says it connects to a DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word, and Outlook, and that it is SOC 2, ISO, and HIPAA compliant.
- Precio
- $499 per user/month
- Individual is $499 per user/month, or $2,999 per user/year, which the page says saves 50% compared with monthly. Enterprise is custom volume-based pricing with firm-wide access, onboarding, and an account manager. The Individual plan includes US federal regulations, state laws, and case law across all 50 states. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funciones
- DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.
5
Clio
Law firms that want practice management, billing, and matter-aware AI in one system.
Clio Manage is practice-management software for matters, documents, time, billing, trust accounting, and client payments. The pricing page says AI is included on Core and above, grounded in the firm's matters, and that firm data is not used to train AI.
- Precio
- From $49/user/mo
- Clio's plans start at $49 USD per user per month. The four plans are Starter, Core, Signature, and Elite. Dollar prices above the $49 starting point were not listed on the page opened. AI features such as drafted bills, client updates, and scheduling are on Core and above. Accounting, including trust reconciliation, is included on every plan. Card payments are listed at 2.95% (3.75% American Express) and eCheck and ACH at 1%. The page title offers a free trial. Clio states SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, and 99.9% uptime. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funciones
- Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, QuickBooks, Xero, TrustBooks. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.
6
CoCounsel
Firms and professional teams that want AI tied to Westlaw, Practical Law, or Checkpoint.
CoCounsel is Thomson Reuters' AI for legal, tax, audit, compliance, and drafting work, grounded in its content and connected to Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint, Microsoft 365, and document-management partners. The company says customer content and prompts are not used to train CoCounsel or the underlying models, and that OpenAI and Google calls use zero-retention APIs.
- Precio
- Not published
- The CoCounsel product page opened does not list a dollar price or a free trial. A separate Thomson Reuters sales page, seen in search but not opened, says online pricing is available only for new law-firm customers with up to 10 attorneys. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funciones
- Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint, Microsoft 365. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.
Qué dicen
El mismo comentario de r/biglaw agrupa CoCounsel con las herramientas más pequeñas que reemplazaron un puesto de Harvey para la redacción diaria.
En ese hilo no leímos un fallo aparte de CoCounsel. El punto compartido es que una persona sigue revisando el borrador.
“Still have to review everything yourself either way.”
Reddit
7
Lexis+ AI
Attorneys who want drafting and research grounded in LexisNexis authority and Shepard's.
The Lexis+ with Protégé free-trial page, which describes the product formerly presented as Lexis+ AI, says it accelerates research, drafting, and analysis grounded in LexisNexis content and Shepard's citations. It also says general AI and legal AI can be used together in one secure workspace.
- Precio
- Not published
- The original product URL returned HTTP 403. The free-trial page that did open invites a Lexis+ with Protégé trial and does not list a price or trial length. A subscription dollar amount was not verified. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funciones
- Shepard's. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.
8
Eve
Personal injury and other plaintiff firms that want intake, medical review, and drafting in one system.
EveOS is an AI operating system for plaintiff law firms, covering intake, medical chronologies, demand letters, discovery, research, and a nightly auditor that reviews active matters. Eve says it is trusted by 1,200+ firms, is SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA compliant, and does not use case data to train shared models.
- Precio
- Not published
- The homepage offers a demo and a call. No dollar price, free tier, or trial length is listed. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funciones
- CMS. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
9
EvenUp
Personal injury firms that want demands, medical review, and negotiation support from case files.
EvenUp is AI for personal injury firms covering intake, treatment tracking, demands, negotiation, discovery, and trial prep. The site says demands can be instant AI drafts or legal-reviewed drafts, cites a 250K+ verdict and settlement dataset, and says the company is SOC 2-audited and HIPAA-attested.
- Precio
- Not published
- No price, free tier, or trial is listed on the homepage opened. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funciones
- CMS. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
10
Luminance
Enterprises that want contract review and portfolio insight beyond the legal department.
Luminance is a contract-intelligence platform for negotiating with playbooks, discovering risk and obligations across a portfolio, and automating workflows from intake to signature. It says it is used by 1,000+ enterprises and lists ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II.
- Precio
- Not published
- The homepage offers a demo and does not list a price, free tier, or trial. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funciones
- None named on the pages we opened. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
Qué es un agente de IA
La IA jurídica revisa contratos, busca jurisprudencia y redacta con cita. Harvey, Spellbook y CoCounsel no son un abogado de consumo. Los precios de bufete suelen ser a medida.
Cómo está organizada esta lista
Arriba de esta lista están Harvey, Legora, Spellbook. El orden sigue la puntuación publicada, no un anuncio.
Qué comparar
Mira el trabajo, el precio de salida y si una persona sigue aprobando el resultado.
- Un trabajo que el producto hace de verdad
- Un precio publicado, un plan gratis o un precio a medida dicho con claridad
- Una revisión antes de que el trabajo llegue al cliente
Para qué sirve este tipo de software
Sirve cuando el mismo paso se repite. La decisión sigue siendo de una persona.
- Ver el precio de salida antes de una demo
- Comparar productos de este trabajo, no una ventana de chat general
- Abrir la ficha para las notas más largas
Para quién es esta lista
Para quien ya conoce el trabajo y quiere los productos que lo hacen, con fecha en los precios.
Precios de salida publicados
Cifras de salida que pudimos comprobar: Harvey (Not published), Legora (Not published), Spellbook (Not published). Revisado el 5 de octubre de 2026.
Cómo elegir
Primero encaja el trabajo. Luego mira para quién es el producto y si puedes empezar sin una llamada de ventas.
Categorías relacionadas
Los trabajos vecinos tienen su propia lista.
Preguntas frecuentes
Método de puntuación
Revisado 5 October 2026
Cada producto se puntúa sobre 100 con las mismas seis partes. El puesto sigue el total, luego el encaje y luego el nombre. Leer el método completo.