Migliori strumenti di IA legale
L'IA legale rivede contratti, cerca giurisprudenza e scrive con citazione. Harvey, Spellbook e CoCounsel non sono un avvocato per i consumatori. Il prezzo da studio è spesso su misura.
10 prodotti. Prezzi e schede controllati il 5 ottobre 2026.
Migliori strumenti di IA legale a confronto
Il prezzo è la cifra di partenza pubblicata dal fornitore. Un piano gratis o una prova compaiono solo se la pagina prezzi lo dice.
| Prodotto | Prezzo | Piano gratis o prova | Funzioni | Integrazioni | Per chi | Cosa dicono |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvey #1 | Not published | Non indicato | AI platform for law firms and in-house legal teams. | SAML SSO | Large law firms and corporate legal departments running high-stakes work on one platform. | Chi fa contenzioso su r/biglaw dice che Harvey basta per il lavoro cliente quando lo studio non permette un chatbot pubblico, e cita revisione e controllo delle contraddizioni. Reddit |
| Legora #2 | Not published | Non indicato | Collaborative AI and an agentic operating system for legal work. | Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook | Law firms and in-house teams that want agentic workflows across research, review, and delivery. | Su r/legaltech, un confronto dice che Legora sembrava più facile di Harvey per uno studio piccolo. Reddit |
| Spellbook #3 | Not published | Prova | AI for contract review, drafting, and playbooks in Word. | Microsoft Word, Email, Slack | Law firms and in-house teams that negotiate contracts in Microsoft Word. | Un commento su r/biglaw di chi ha lasciato Harvey per strumenti più piccoli nomina Spellbook come uno dei posti in cui è arrivato. Reddit |
| Paxton #4 | $499 per user/month | Non indicato | Litigation workspace for matter files, research, and drafts. | DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook | Litigation attorneys and small firms that want research and drafts tied to the case file. | Nessun commento con fonte. |
| Clio #5 | From $49/user/mo | Prova | Legal practice management with AI on Core plans and above. | Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, QuickBooks, Xero | Law firms that want practice management, billing, and matter-aware AI in one system. | Nessun commento con fonte. |
| CoCounsel #6 | Not published | Non indicato | Thomson Reuters AI for legal, tax, audit, and compliance work. | Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint, Microsoft 365 | Firms and professional teams that want AI tied to Westlaw, Practical Law, or Checkpoint. | Lo stesso commento su r/biglaw mette CoCounsel tra gli strumenti più piccoli che hanno sostituito un posto Harvey per la stesura quotidiana. Reddit |
| Lexis+ AI #7 | Not published | Prova | Legal AI for research, drafting, and analysis, now branded with Protégé. | Shepard's | Attorneys who want drafting and research grounded in LexisNexis authority and Shepard's. | Nessun commento con fonte. |
| Eve #8 | Not published | Non indicato | AI operating system for plaintiff law firms. | CMS | Personal injury and other plaintiff firms that want intake, medical review, and drafting in one system. | Nessun commento con fonte. |
| EvenUp #9 | Not published | Non indicato | Proactive AI across the personal-injury case lifecycle. | CMS | Personal injury firms that want demands, medical review, and negotiation support from case files. | Nessun commento con fonte. |
| Luminance #10 | Not published | Non indicato | Contract intelligence for legal, procurement, finance, and the wider enterprise. | None named on the pages we opened | Enterprises that want contract review and portfolio insight beyond the legal department. | Nessun commento con fonte. |
Classifica
L'ordine guarda l'aderenza al lavoro, l'autonomia, i controlli, le integrazioni, l'accesso e quanto il prodotto è pubblico.
| # | Agente | Per chi | Prezzo | Piano gratis | Autonomia | Integrazioni | Punteggio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harvey | Large law firms and corporate legal departments running high-stakes work on one platform. | Not published | No | Semi-autonomous | SAML SSO | Dettaglio73
|
| 2 | Legora | Law firms and in-house teams that want agentic workflows across research, review, and delivery. | Not published | No | Semi-autonomous | Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook | Dettaglio73
|
| 3 | Spellbook | Law firms and in-house teams that negotiate contracts in Microsoft Word. | Not published | Prova | Semi-autonomous | Microsoft Word, Email, Slack | Dettaglio73
|
| 4 | Paxton | Litigation attorneys and small firms that want research and drafts tied to the case file. | $499 per user/month | No | Copilot | DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word +1 | Dettaglio72
|
| 5 | Clio | Law firms that want practice management, billing, and matter-aware AI in one system. | From $49/user/mo | Prova | Copilot | Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, QuickBooks +2 | Dettaglio72
|
| 6 | CoCounsel | Firms and professional teams that want AI tied to Westlaw, Practical Law, or Checkpoint. | Not published | No | Copilot | Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint +1 | Dettaglio70
|
| 7 | Lexis+ AI | Attorneys who want drafting and research grounded in LexisNexis authority and Shepard's. | Not published | Prova | Copilot | Shepard's | Dettaglio66
|
| 8 | Eve | Personal injury and other plaintiff firms that want intake, medical review, and drafting in one system. | Not published | No | Semi-autonomous | CMS | Dettaglio66
|
| 9 | EvenUp | Personal injury firms that want demands, medical review, and negotiation support from case files. | Not published | No | Semi-autonomous | CMS | Dettaglio65
|
| 10 | Luminance | Enterprises that want contract review and portfolio insight beyond the legal department. | Not published | No | Semi-autonomous | None named on the pages we opened | Dettaglio62
|
Posto 1
Harvey73
Large law firms and corporate legal departments running high-stakes work on one platform.
- Prezzo
- Not published
- Piano gratis
- No
- Autonomia
- Semi-autonomous
- Integrazioni
- SAML SSO
Dettaglio73
- Fit for the job29/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations6/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Posto 2
Legora73
Law firms and in-house teams that want agentic workflows across research, review, and delivery.
- Prezzo
- Not published
- Piano gratis
- No
- Autonomia
- Semi-autonomous
- Integrazioni
- Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook
Dettaglio73
- Fit for the job28/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations7/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Posto 3
Spellbook73
Law firms and in-house teams that negotiate contracts in Microsoft Word.
- Prezzo
- Not published
- Piano gratis
- Prova
- Autonomia
- Semi-autonomous
- Integrazioni
- Microsoft Word, Email, Slack
Dettaglio73
- Fit for the job27/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations8/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Posto 4
Paxton72
Litigation attorneys and small firms that want research and drafts tied to the case file.
- Prezzo
- $499 per user/month
- Piano gratis
- No
- Autonomia
- Copilot
- Integrazioni
- DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word
Dettaglio72
- Fit for the job24/30
- Autonomy9/20
- Controls13/15
- Integrations9/15
- Access8/10
- Evidence9/10
Posto 5
Clio72
Law firms that want practice management, billing, and matter-aware AI in one system.
- Prezzo
- From $49/user/mo
- Piano gratis
- Prova
- Autonomia
- Copilot
- Integrazioni
- Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, QuickBooks
Dettaglio72
- Fit for the job23/30
- Autonomy9/20
- Controls13/15
- Integrations10/15
- Access8/10
- Evidence9/10
Posto 6
CoCounsel70
Firms and professional teams that want AI tied to Westlaw, Practical Law, or Checkpoint.
- Prezzo
- Not published
- Piano gratis
- No
- Autonomia
- Copilot
- Integrazioni
- Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint
Dettaglio70
- Fit for the job26/30
- Autonomy9/20
- Controls13/15
- Integrations9/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Posto 7
Lexis+ AI66
Attorneys who want drafting and research grounded in LexisNexis authority and Shepard's.
- Prezzo
- Not published
- Piano gratis
- Prova
- Autonomia
- Copilot
- Integrazioni
- Shepard's
Dettaglio66
- Fit for the job25/30
- Autonomy9/20
- Controls13/15
- Integrations6/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Posto 8
Eve66
Personal injury and other plaintiff firms that want intake, medical review, and drafting in one system.
- Prezzo
- Not published
- Piano gratis
- No
- Autonomia
- Semi-autonomous
- Integrazioni
- CMS
Dettaglio66
- Fit for the job22/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations6/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Posto 9
EvenUp65
Personal injury firms that want demands, medical review, and negotiation support from case files.
- Prezzo
- Not published
- Piano gratis
- No
- Autonomia
- Semi-autonomous
- Integrazioni
- CMS
Dettaglio65
- Fit for the job21/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations6/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Posto 10
Luminance62
Enterprises that want contract review and portfolio insight beyond the legal department.
- Prezzo
- Not published
- Piano gratis
- No
- Autonomia
- Semi-autonomous
- Integrazioni
- None named on the pages we opened
Dettaglio62
- Fit for the job20/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations4/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Prezzi, funzioni e schede
1
Harvey
Large law firms and corporate legal departments running high-stakes work on one platform.
Harvey is an AI platform for law firms and in-house teams, with agents, shared Spaces, a document Vault, contract intelligence, and a command center for usage. The site says more than 3,000 legal organizations use it and that default controls include SAML SSO, audit logs, IP allow-listing, and data lifecycle management.
- Prezzo
- Not published
- No price, plan, or free trial is listed on the homepage opened. Access is presented through the product site rather than a public rate card. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funzioni
- SAML SSO. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
Cosa dicono
Chi fa contenzioso su r/biglaw dice che Harvey basta per il lavoro cliente quando lo studio non permette un chatbot pubblico, e cita revisione e controllo delle contraddizioni.
Su r/legaltech, un utente di un pilota dice che la vendita è stata pesante e che il prodotto sembrava un’interfaccia sottile su GPT. La lamentela è il prezzo, non un elenco di funzioni mancanti.
“I find Harvey invaluable in my work (I’m a litigator). I think that ChatGPT performs better, but Harvey is more than good enough, and we’re not authorized to use public models with client materials.”
Reddit“For the price, complete bullshit. the sales team oversells like crazy, but under the hood it’s just a thin UI on top of GPT with a prompt sheet and some document storage.”
Reddit · u/tulumtimes2425
2
Legora
Law firms and in-house teams that want agentic workflows across research, review, and delivery.
Legora describes itself as collaborative AI for lawyers, with the Legora aOS connecting information, communication, and execution of legal work. Its Agent plans, executes, reviews, and delivers work, and the product list includes a Word add-in, Outlook add-in, tabular review, legal research, and a portal.
- Prezzo
- Not published
- The homepage offers a demo and does not list a price, plan, free tier, or trial. The site cites SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, GDPR, and HIPAA, and says customer data is not used for AI training. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funzioni
- Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
Cosa dicono
Su r/legaltech, un confronto dice che Legora sembrava più facile di Harvey per uno studio piccolo.
Lo stesso commento lo chiama più limitato, e un altro dice che non è ciò che uno studio grande dovrebbe comprare.
3
Spellbook
Law firms and in-house teams that negotiate contracts in Microsoft Word.
Spellbook reviews and drafts contracts and applies playbooks, with intake from email and Slack and a Word add-in plus an Associate multi-document agent. The company says it is trusted by 5,000+ legal teams and lists SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, and zero data retention with LLM providers.
- Prezzo
- Not published
- Pricing is custom and based on the number of team members on the license. No dollar amount is published. A 7-day free trial is offered, with extended trials possible for larger organizations. Academic institutions can inquire about free access. Dedicated support is listed for teams over 10. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funzioni
- Microsoft Word, Email, Slack. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
Cosa dicono
Un commento su r/biglaw di chi ha lasciato Harvey per strumenti più piccoli nomina Spellbook come uno dei posti in cui è arrivato.
Quel commento non descrive un fallimento di Spellbook. Dice che il risultato va comunque rivisto da soli.
“So I moved to smaller tools like Spellbook, AI Lawyer, and CoCounsel and it honestly felt like the same practical benefit with less fuss.”
Reddit
4
Paxton
Litigation attorneys and small firms that want research and drafts tied to the case file.
Paxton is AI for litigation teams that keeps the matter record, legal research, and drafting in one workspace, with citations to case files and authority. The site says it connects to a DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word, and Outlook, and that it is SOC 2, ISO, and HIPAA compliant.
- Prezzo
- $499 per user/month
- Individual is $499 per user/month, or $2,999 per user/year, which the page says saves 50% compared with monthly. Enterprise is custom volume-based pricing with firm-wide access, onboarding, and an account manager. The Individual plan includes US federal regulations, state laws, and case law across all 50 states. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funzioni
- DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.
5
Clio
Law firms that want practice management, billing, and matter-aware AI in one system.
Clio Manage is practice-management software for matters, documents, time, billing, trust accounting, and client payments. The pricing page says AI is included on Core and above, grounded in the firm's matters, and that firm data is not used to train AI.
- Prezzo
- From $49/user/mo
- Clio's plans start at $49 USD per user per month. The four plans are Starter, Core, Signature, and Elite. Dollar prices above the $49 starting point were not listed on the page opened. AI features such as drafted bills, client updates, and scheduling are on Core and above. Accounting, including trust reconciliation, is included on every plan. Card payments are listed at 2.95% (3.75% American Express) and eCheck and ACH at 1%. The page title offers a free trial. Clio states SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, and 99.9% uptime. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funzioni
- Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, QuickBooks, Xero, TrustBooks. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.
6
CoCounsel
Firms and professional teams that want AI tied to Westlaw, Practical Law, or Checkpoint.
CoCounsel is Thomson Reuters' AI for legal, tax, audit, compliance, and drafting work, grounded in its content and connected to Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint, Microsoft 365, and document-management partners. The company says customer content and prompts are not used to train CoCounsel or the underlying models, and that OpenAI and Google calls use zero-retention APIs.
- Prezzo
- Not published
- The CoCounsel product page opened does not list a dollar price or a free trial. A separate Thomson Reuters sales page, seen in search but not opened, says online pricing is available only for new law-firm customers with up to 10 attorneys. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funzioni
- Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint, Microsoft 365. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.
Cosa dicono
Lo stesso commento su r/biglaw mette CoCounsel tra gli strumenti più piccoli che hanno sostituito un posto Harvey per la stesura quotidiana.
In quel thread non abbiamo letto un fallimento distinto di CoCounsel. Il punto comune è che una persona controlla ancora la bozza.
“Still have to review everything yourself either way.”
Reddit
7
Lexis+ AI
Attorneys who want drafting and research grounded in LexisNexis authority and Shepard's.
The Lexis+ with Protégé free-trial page, which describes the product formerly presented as Lexis+ AI, says it accelerates research, drafting, and analysis grounded in LexisNexis content and Shepard's citations. It also says general AI and legal AI can be used together in one secure workspace.
- Prezzo
- Not published
- The original product URL returned HTTP 403. The free-trial page that did open invites a Lexis+ with Protégé trial and does not list a price or trial length. A subscription dollar amount was not verified. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funzioni
- Shepard's. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.
8
Eve
Personal injury and other plaintiff firms that want intake, medical review, and drafting in one system.
EveOS is an AI operating system for plaintiff law firms, covering intake, medical chronologies, demand letters, discovery, research, and a nightly auditor that reviews active matters. Eve says it is trusted by 1,200+ firms, is SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA compliant, and does not use case data to train shared models.
- Prezzo
- Not published
- The homepage offers a demo and a call. No dollar price, free tier, or trial length is listed. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funzioni
- CMS. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
9
EvenUp
Personal injury firms that want demands, medical review, and negotiation support from case files.
EvenUp is AI for personal injury firms covering intake, treatment tracking, demands, negotiation, discovery, and trial prep. The site says demands can be instant AI drafts or legal-reviewed drafts, cites a 250K+ verdict and settlement dataset, and says the company is SOC 2-audited and HIPAA-attested.
- Prezzo
- Not published
- No price, free tier, or trial is listed on the homepage opened. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funzioni
- CMS. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
10
Luminance
Enterprises that want contract review and portfolio insight beyond the legal department.
Luminance is a contract-intelligence platform for negotiating with playbooks, discovering risk and obligations across a portfolio, and automating workflows from intake to signature. It says it is used by 1,000+ enterprises and lists ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II.
- Prezzo
- Not published
- The homepage offers a demo and does not list a price, free tier, or trial. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funzioni
- None named on the pages we opened. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
Che cos'è un agente IA
L'IA legale rivede contratti, cerca giurisprudenza e scrive con citazione. Harvey, Spellbook e CoCounsel non sono un avvocato per i consumatori. Il prezzo da studio è spesso su misura.
Come è organizzata questa lista
In cima a questa lista ci sono Harvey, Legora, Spellbook. L'ordine segue il punteggio pubblicato, non un annuncio.
Cosa confrontare
Guarda il lavoro, il prezzo di partenza e se una persona approva ancora il risultato.
- Un lavoro che il prodotto fa davvero
- Un prezzo pubblicato, un piano gratis o un prezzo su misura detto in modo chiaro
- Un controllo prima che il lavoro arrivi al cliente
A cosa serve questo tipo di software
Serve quando lo stesso passo si ripete. La decisione resta a una persona.
- Vedere il prezzo di partenza prima di una demo
- Confrontare prodotti di questo lavoro, non una finestra di chat generica
- Aprire la scheda per le note più lunghe
A chi serve questa lista
A chi conosce già il lavoro e vuole i prodotti che lo fanno, con una data sui prezzi.
Prezzi di partenza pubblicati
Cifre di partenza che abbiamo potuto controllare: Harvey (Not published), Legora (Not published), Spellbook (Not published). Controllo del 5 ottobre 2026.
Come scegliere
Prima allinea il lavoro. Poi leggi per chi è il prodotto e se puoi iniziare senza una chiamata commerciale.
Categorie vicine
I lavori vicini hanno una lista propria.
Domande frequenti
Metodo di punteggio
Controllato 5 October 2026
Ogni prodotto è valutato su 100 con le stesse sei parti. Il posto segue il totale, poi l'aderenza, poi il nome. Leggi il metodo completo.