Beste juristische KI-Tools
Juristische KI prüft Verträge, sucht Rechtsprechung und schreibt mit Beleg. Harvey, Spellbook und CoCounsel sind kein Verbraucher-Anwalt. Kanzleipreise sind oft individuell.
10 Produkte. Preise und Texte zuletzt geprüft am 5. Oktober 2026.
Beste juristische KI-Tools im Vergleich
Der Preis ist der veröffentlichte Startpreis des Anbieters. Ein Gratisplan oder Test steht nur da, wenn die Preisseite das sagt.
| Produkt | Preis | Gratisplan oder Test | Funktionen | Integrationen | Geeignet für | Was Nutzer sagen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvey #1 | Not published | Nicht angegeben | AI platform for law firms and in-house legal teams. | SAML SSO | Large law firms and corporate legal departments running high-stakes work on one platform. | Prozessanwälte auf r/biglaw sagen, Harvey reiche für Mandantenarbeit, wenn die Kanzlei keinen öffentlichen Chatbot erlaubt, und sie nennen Prüfung und Widerspruchssuche. Reddit |
| Legora #2 | Not published | Nicht angegeben | Collaborative AI and an agentic operating system for legal work. | Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook | Law firms and in-house teams that want agentic workflows across research, review, and delivery. | Auf r/legaltech sagt ein Vergleich, Legora wirke für eine kleinere Kanzlei leichter als Harvey. Reddit |
| Spellbook #3 | Not published | Test | AI for contract review, drafting, and playbooks in Word. | Microsoft Word, Email, Slack | Law firms and in-house teams that negotiate contracts in Microsoft Word. | Ein Kommentar auf r/biglaw von jemandem, der Harvey für kleinere Tools verließ, nennt Spellbook als einen der Landeplätze. Reddit |
| Paxton #4 | $499 per user/month | Nicht angegeben | Litigation workspace for matter files, research, and drafts. | DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook | Litigation attorneys and small firms that want research and drafts tied to the case file. | Keine belegte Aussage. |
| Clio #5 | From $49/user/mo | Test | Legal practice management with AI on Core plans and above. | Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, QuickBooks, Xero | Law firms that want practice management, billing, and matter-aware AI in one system. | Keine belegte Aussage. |
| CoCounsel #6 | Not published | Nicht angegeben | Thomson Reuters AI for legal, tax, audit, and compliance work. | Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint, Microsoft 365 | Firms and professional teams that want AI tied to Westlaw, Practical Law, or Checkpoint. | Derselbe Kommentar auf r/biglaw stellt CoCounsel zu den kleineren Tools, die einen Harvey-Platz für den Alltagstext ersetzt haben. Reddit |
| Lexis+ AI #7 | Not published | Test | Legal AI for research, drafting, and analysis, now branded with Protégé. | Shepard's | Attorneys who want drafting and research grounded in LexisNexis authority and Shepard's. | Keine belegte Aussage. |
| Eve #8 | Not published | Nicht angegeben | AI operating system for plaintiff law firms. | CMS | Personal injury and other plaintiff firms that want intake, medical review, and drafting in one system. | Keine belegte Aussage. |
| EvenUp #9 | Not published | Nicht angegeben | Proactive AI across the personal-injury case lifecycle. | CMS | Personal injury firms that want demands, medical review, and negotiation support from case files. | Keine belegte Aussage. |
| Luminance #10 | Not published | Nicht angegeben | Contract intelligence for legal, procurement, finance, and the wider enterprise. | None named on the pages we opened | Enterprises that want contract review and portfolio insight beyond the legal department. | Keine belegte Aussage. |
Rangliste
Die Reihenfolge achtet auf Passung, Autonomie, Kontrolle, Integrationen, Zugang und wie öffentlich das Produkt ist.
| # | Agent | Geeignet für | Preis | Gratisplan | Autonomie | Integrationen | Punktzahl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harvey | Large law firms and corporate legal departments running high-stakes work on one platform. | Not published | Nein | Semi-autonomous | SAML SSO | Punkte im Detail73
|
| 2 | Legora | Law firms and in-house teams that want agentic workflows across research, review, and delivery. | Not published | Nein | Semi-autonomous | Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook | Punkte im Detail73
|
| 3 | Spellbook | Law firms and in-house teams that negotiate contracts in Microsoft Word. | Not published | Test | Semi-autonomous | Microsoft Word, Email, Slack | Punkte im Detail73
|
| 4 | Paxton | Litigation attorneys and small firms that want research and drafts tied to the case file. | $499 per user/month | Nein | Copilot | DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word +1 | Punkte im Detail72
|
| 5 | Clio | Law firms that want practice management, billing, and matter-aware AI in one system. | From $49/user/mo | Test | Copilot | Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, QuickBooks +2 | Punkte im Detail72
|
| 6 | CoCounsel | Firms and professional teams that want AI tied to Westlaw, Practical Law, or Checkpoint. | Not published | Nein | Copilot | Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint +1 | Punkte im Detail70
|
| 7 | Lexis+ AI | Attorneys who want drafting and research grounded in LexisNexis authority and Shepard's. | Not published | Test | Copilot | Shepard's | Punkte im Detail66
|
| 8 | Eve | Personal injury and other plaintiff firms that want intake, medical review, and drafting in one system. | Not published | Nein | Semi-autonomous | CMS | Punkte im Detail66
|
| 9 | EvenUp | Personal injury firms that want demands, medical review, and negotiation support from case files. | Not published | Nein | Semi-autonomous | CMS | Punkte im Detail65
|
| 10 | Luminance | Enterprises that want contract review and portfolio insight beyond the legal department. | Not published | Nein | Semi-autonomous | None named on the pages we opened | Punkte im Detail62
|
Platz 1
Harvey73
Large law firms and corporate legal departments running high-stakes work on one platform.
- Preis
- Not published
- Gratisplan
- Nein
- Autonomie
- Semi-autonomous
- Integrationen
- SAML SSO
Punkte im Detail73
- Fit for the job29/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations6/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Platz 2
Legora73
Law firms and in-house teams that want agentic workflows across research, review, and delivery.
- Preis
- Not published
- Gratisplan
- Nein
- Autonomie
- Semi-autonomous
- Integrationen
- Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook
Punkte im Detail73
- Fit for the job28/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations7/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Platz 3
Spellbook73
Law firms and in-house teams that negotiate contracts in Microsoft Word.
- Preis
- Not published
- Gratisplan
- Test
- Autonomie
- Semi-autonomous
- Integrationen
- Microsoft Word, Email, Slack
Punkte im Detail73
- Fit for the job27/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations8/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Platz 4
Paxton72
Litigation attorneys and small firms that want research and drafts tied to the case file.
- Preis
- $499 per user/month
- Gratisplan
- Nein
- Autonomie
- Copilot
- Integrationen
- DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word
Punkte im Detail72
- Fit for the job24/30
- Autonomy9/20
- Controls13/15
- Integrations9/15
- Access8/10
- Evidence9/10
Platz 5
Clio72
Law firms that want practice management, billing, and matter-aware AI in one system.
- Preis
- From $49/user/mo
- Gratisplan
- Test
- Autonomie
- Copilot
- Integrationen
- Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, QuickBooks
Punkte im Detail72
- Fit for the job23/30
- Autonomy9/20
- Controls13/15
- Integrations10/15
- Access8/10
- Evidence9/10
Platz 6
CoCounsel70
Firms and professional teams that want AI tied to Westlaw, Practical Law, or Checkpoint.
- Preis
- Not published
- Gratisplan
- Nein
- Autonomie
- Copilot
- Integrationen
- Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint
Punkte im Detail70
- Fit for the job26/30
- Autonomy9/20
- Controls13/15
- Integrations9/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Platz 7
Lexis+ AI66
Attorneys who want drafting and research grounded in LexisNexis authority and Shepard's.
- Preis
- Not published
- Gratisplan
- Test
- Autonomie
- Copilot
- Integrationen
- Shepard's
Punkte im Detail66
- Fit for the job25/30
- Autonomy9/20
- Controls13/15
- Integrations6/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Platz 8
Eve66
Personal injury and other plaintiff firms that want intake, medical review, and drafting in one system.
- Preis
- Not published
- Gratisplan
- Nein
- Autonomie
- Semi-autonomous
- Integrationen
- CMS
Punkte im Detail66
- Fit for the job22/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations6/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Platz 9
EvenUp65
Personal injury firms that want demands, medical review, and negotiation support from case files.
- Preis
- Not published
- Gratisplan
- Nein
- Autonomie
- Semi-autonomous
- Integrationen
- CMS
Punkte im Detail65
- Fit for the job21/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations6/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Platz 10
Luminance62
Enterprises that want contract review and portfolio insight beyond the legal department.
- Preis
- Not published
- Gratisplan
- Nein
- Autonomie
- Semi-autonomous
- Integrationen
- None named on the pages we opened
Punkte im Detail62
- Fit for the job20/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations4/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Preise, Funktionen und Kurzprofile
1
Harvey
Large law firms and corporate legal departments running high-stakes work on one platform.
Harvey is an AI platform for law firms and in-house teams, with agents, shared Spaces, a document Vault, contract intelligence, and a command center for usage. The site says more than 3,000 legal organizations use it and that default controls include SAML SSO, audit logs, IP allow-listing, and data lifecycle management.
- Preis
- Not published
- No price, plan, or free trial is listed on the homepage opened. Access is presented through the product site rather than a public rate card. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funktionen
- SAML SSO. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
Was Nutzer sagen
Prozessanwälte auf r/biglaw sagen, Harvey reiche für Mandantenarbeit, wenn die Kanzlei keinen öffentlichen Chatbot erlaubt, und sie nennen Prüfung und Widerspruchssuche.
Auf r/legaltech sagt ein Pilotnutzer, der Vertrieb sei schwer gewesen und das Produkt wirke wie eine dünne Oberfläche auf GPT. Die Klage ist der Preis, nicht eine fehlende Funktionsliste.
“I find Harvey invaluable in my work (I’m a litigator). I think that ChatGPT performs better, but Harvey is more than good enough, and we’re not authorized to use public models with client materials.”
Reddit“For the price, complete bullshit. the sales team oversells like crazy, but under the hood it’s just a thin UI on top of GPT with a prompt sheet and some document storage.”
Reddit · u/tulumtimes2425
2
Legora
Law firms and in-house teams that want agentic workflows across research, review, and delivery.
Legora describes itself as collaborative AI for lawyers, with the Legora aOS connecting information, communication, and execution of legal work. Its Agent plans, executes, reviews, and delivers work, and the product list includes a Word add-in, Outlook add-in, tabular review, legal research, and a portal.
- Preis
- Not published
- The homepage offers a demo and does not list a price, plan, free tier, or trial. The site cites SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, GDPR, and HIPAA, and says customer data is not used for AI training. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funktionen
- Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
Was Nutzer sagen
Auf r/legaltech sagt ein Vergleich, Legora wirke für eine kleinere Kanzlei leichter als Harvey.
Derselbe Kommentar nennt es begrenzter, und ein anderer sagt, eine große Kanzlei sollte es nicht kaufen.
3
Spellbook
Law firms and in-house teams that negotiate contracts in Microsoft Word.
Spellbook reviews and drafts contracts and applies playbooks, with intake from email and Slack and a Word add-in plus an Associate multi-document agent. The company says it is trusted by 5,000+ legal teams and lists SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, and zero data retention with LLM providers.
- Preis
- Not published
- Pricing is custom and based on the number of team members on the license. No dollar amount is published. A 7-day free trial is offered, with extended trials possible for larger organizations. Academic institutions can inquire about free access. Dedicated support is listed for teams over 10. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funktionen
- Microsoft Word, Email, Slack. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
Was Nutzer sagen
Ein Kommentar auf r/biglaw von jemandem, der Harvey für kleinere Tools verließ, nennt Spellbook als einen der Landeplätze.
Der Kommentar beschreibt keinen Spellbook-Fehler. Er sagt, das Ergebnis müsse man selbst prüfen.
“So I moved to smaller tools like Spellbook, AI Lawyer, and CoCounsel and it honestly felt like the same practical benefit with less fuss.”
Reddit
Preis und Funktionen von Spellbook/Alternativen zu Spellbook
4
Paxton
Litigation attorneys and small firms that want research and drafts tied to the case file.
Paxton is AI for litigation teams that keeps the matter record, legal research, and drafting in one workspace, with citations to case files and authority. The site says it connects to a DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word, and Outlook, and that it is SOC 2, ISO, and HIPAA compliant.
- Preis
- $499 per user/month
- Individual is $499 per user/month, or $2,999 per user/year, which the page says saves 50% compared with monthly. Enterprise is custom volume-based pricing with firm-wide access, onboarding, and an account manager. The Individual plan includes US federal regulations, state laws, and case law across all 50 states. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funktionen
- DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.
5
Clio
Law firms that want practice management, billing, and matter-aware AI in one system.
Clio Manage is practice-management software for matters, documents, time, billing, trust accounting, and client payments. The pricing page says AI is included on Core and above, grounded in the firm's matters, and that firm data is not used to train AI.
- Preis
- From $49/user/mo
- Clio's plans start at $49 USD per user per month. The four plans are Starter, Core, Signature, and Elite. Dollar prices above the $49 starting point were not listed on the page opened. AI features such as drafted bills, client updates, and scheduling are on Core and above. Accounting, including trust reconciliation, is included on every plan. Card payments are listed at 2.95% (3.75% American Express) and eCheck and ACH at 1%. The page title offers a free trial. Clio states SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, and 99.9% uptime. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funktionen
- Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, QuickBooks, Xero, TrustBooks. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.
6
CoCounsel
Firms and professional teams that want AI tied to Westlaw, Practical Law, or Checkpoint.
CoCounsel is Thomson Reuters' AI for legal, tax, audit, compliance, and drafting work, grounded in its content and connected to Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint, Microsoft 365, and document-management partners. The company says customer content and prompts are not used to train CoCounsel or the underlying models, and that OpenAI and Google calls use zero-retention APIs.
- Preis
- Not published
- The CoCounsel product page opened does not list a dollar price or a free trial. A separate Thomson Reuters sales page, seen in search but not opened, says online pricing is available only for new law-firm customers with up to 10 attorneys. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funktionen
- Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint, Microsoft 365. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.
Was Nutzer sagen
Derselbe Kommentar auf r/biglaw stellt CoCounsel zu den kleineren Tools, die einen Harvey-Platz für den Alltagstext ersetzt haben.
In dem Thread stand kein eigener CoCounsel-Fehler. Der gemeinsame Punkt ist, dass ein Mensch den Entwurf weiter prüft.
“Still have to review everything yourself either way.”
Reddit
Preis und Funktionen von CoCounsel/Alternativen zu CoCounsel
7
Lexis+ AI
Attorneys who want drafting and research grounded in LexisNexis authority and Shepard's.
The Lexis+ with Protégé free-trial page, which describes the product formerly presented as Lexis+ AI, says it accelerates research, drafting, and analysis grounded in LexisNexis content and Shepard's citations. It also says general AI and legal AI can be used together in one secure workspace.
- Preis
- Not published
- The original product URL returned HTTP 403. The free-trial page that did open invites a Lexis+ with Protégé trial and does not list a price or trial length. A subscription dollar amount was not verified. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funktionen
- Shepard's. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.
Preis und Funktionen von Lexis+ AI/Alternativen zu Lexis+ AI
8
Eve
Personal injury and other plaintiff firms that want intake, medical review, and drafting in one system.
EveOS is an AI operating system for plaintiff law firms, covering intake, medical chronologies, demand letters, discovery, research, and a nightly auditor that reviews active matters. Eve says it is trusted by 1,200+ firms, is SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA compliant, and does not use case data to train shared models.
- Preis
- Not published
- The homepage offers a demo and a call. No dollar price, free tier, or trial length is listed. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funktionen
- CMS. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
9
EvenUp
Personal injury firms that want demands, medical review, and negotiation support from case files.
EvenUp is AI for personal injury firms covering intake, treatment tracking, demands, negotiation, discovery, and trial prep. The site says demands can be instant AI drafts or legal-reviewed drafts, cites a 250K+ verdict and settlement dataset, and says the company is SOC 2-audited and HIPAA-attested.
- Preis
- Not published
- No price, free tier, or trial is listed on the homepage opened. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funktionen
- CMS. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
10
Luminance
Enterprises that want contract review and portfolio insight beyond the legal department.
Luminance is a contract-intelligence platform for negotiating with playbooks, discovering risk and obligations across a portfolio, and automating workflows from intake to signature. It says it is used by 1,000+ enterprises and lists ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II.
- Preis
- Not published
- The homepage offers a demo and does not list a price, free tier, or trial. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funktionen
- None named on the pages we opened. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
Preis und Funktionen von Luminance/Alternativen zu Luminance
Was ist ein KI-Agent?
Juristische KI prüft Verträge, sucht Rechtsprechung und schreibt mit Beleg. Harvey, Spellbook und CoCounsel sind kein Verbraucher-Anwalt. Kanzleipreise sind oft individuell.
Wie diese Liste aufgebaut ist
Oben auf dieser Liste stehen Harvey, Legora, Spellbook. Die Reihenfolge folgt der veröffentlichten Punktzahl, nicht einer Anzeige.
Was Sie vergleichen sollten
Sehen Sie auf die Aufgabe, den Einstiegspreis und ob ein Mensch das Ergebnis noch freigibt.
- Eine Aufgabe, die das Produkt wirklich erledigt
- Ein veröffentlichter Preis, ein Gratisplan oder ein klar genannter individueller Preis
- Eine Prüfung, bevor die Arbeit den Kunden erreicht
Wofür diese Software da ist
Sie lohnt sich, wenn derselbe Schritt sich wiederholt. Die Entscheidung bleibt bei einem Menschen.
- Den Einstiegspreis vor einer Demo sehen
- Produkte für diese Aufgabe vergleichen, nicht ein allgemeines Chatfenster
- Die Produktseite für die längeren Notizen öffnen
Für wen diese Liste ist
Für Leute, die die Aufgabe schon kennen und die passenden Produkte wollen, mit Datum an den Preisen.
Veröffentlichte Einstiegspreise
Einstiegszahlen, die wir prüfen konnten: Harvey (Not published), Legora (Not published), Spellbook (Not published). Zuletzt geprüft am 5. Oktober 2026.
Wie Sie wählen
Zuerst die Aufgabe. Dann lesen Sie, für wen das Produkt ist und ob Sie ohne Verkaufsgespräch starten können.
Verwandte Kategorien
Nachbaraufgaben haben eine eigene Liste.
Fragen
Bewertungsmethode
Geprüft 5 October 2026
Jedes Produkt wird mit denselben sechs Teilen von 100 bewertet. Der Platz folgt der Summe, dann der Passung, dann dem Namen. Die ganze Methode lesen.