Zum Inhalt

Beste juristische KI-Tools

Juristische KI prüft Verträge, sucht Rechtsprechung und schreibt mit Beleg. Harvey, Spellbook und CoCounsel sind kein Verbraucher-Anwalt. Kanzleipreise sind oft individuell.

10 Produkte. Preise und Texte zuletzt geprüft am 5. Oktober 2026.

Beste juristische KI-Tools im Vergleich

Der Preis ist der veröffentlichte Startpreis des Anbieters. Ein Gratisplan oder Test steht nur da, wenn die Preisseite das sagt.

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, free plan or trial, features, integrations, best fit, and sourced user comments
ProduktPreisGratisplan oder TestFunktionenIntegrationenGeeignet fürWas Nutzer sagen
Harvey

#1

Not publishedNicht angegebenAI platform for law firms and in-house legal teams.SAML SSOLarge law firms and corporate legal departments running high-stakes work on one platform.

Prozessanwälte auf r/biglaw sagen, Harvey reiche für Mandantenarbeit, wenn die Kanzlei keinen öffentlichen Chatbot erlaubt, und sie nennen Prüfung und Widerspruchssuche.

Reddit
Legora

#2

Not publishedNicht angegebenCollaborative AI and an agentic operating system for legal work.Microsoft Word, Microsoft OutlookLaw firms and in-house teams that want agentic workflows across research, review, and delivery.

Auf r/legaltech sagt ein Vergleich, Legora wirke für eine kleinere Kanzlei leichter als Harvey.

Reddit
Spellbook

#3

Not publishedTestAI for contract review, drafting, and playbooks in Word.Microsoft Word, Email, SlackLaw firms and in-house teams that negotiate contracts in Microsoft Word.

Ein Kommentar auf r/biglaw von jemandem, der Harvey für kleinere Tools verließ, nennt Spellbook als einen der Landeplätze.

Reddit
Paxton

#4

$499 per user/monthNicht angegebenLitigation workspace for matter files, research, and drafts.DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word, Microsoft OutlookLitigation attorneys and small firms that want research and drafts tied to the case file.Keine belegte Aussage.
Clio

#5

From $49/user/moTestLegal practice management with AI on Core plans and above.Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, QuickBooks, XeroLaw firms that want practice management, billing, and matter-aware AI in one system.Keine belegte Aussage.
CoCounsel

#6

Not publishedNicht angegebenThomson Reuters AI for legal, tax, audit, and compliance work.Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint, Microsoft 365Firms and professional teams that want AI tied to Westlaw, Practical Law, or Checkpoint.

Derselbe Kommentar auf r/biglaw stellt CoCounsel zu den kleineren Tools, die einen Harvey-Platz für den Alltagstext ersetzt haben.

Reddit
Lexis+ AI

#7

Not publishedTestLegal AI for research, drafting, and analysis, now branded with Protégé.Shepard'sAttorneys who want drafting and research grounded in LexisNexis authority and Shepard's.Keine belegte Aussage.
Eve

#8

Not publishedNicht angegebenAI operating system for plaintiff law firms.CMSPersonal injury and other plaintiff firms that want intake, medical review, and drafting in one system.Keine belegte Aussage.
EvenUp

#9

Not publishedNicht angegebenProactive AI across the personal-injury case lifecycle.CMSPersonal injury firms that want demands, medical review, and negotiation support from case files.Keine belegte Aussage.
Luminance

#10

Not publishedNicht angegebenContract intelligence for legal, procurement, finance, and the wider enterprise.None named on the pages we openedEnterprises that want contract review and portfolio insight beyond the legal department.Keine belegte Aussage.

Rangliste

Die Reihenfolge achtet auf Passung, Autonomie, Kontrolle, Integrationen, Zugang und wie öffentlich das Produkt ist.

Platz 1

Harvey

73

Large law firms and corporate legal departments running high-stakes work on one platform.

Preis
Not published
Gratisplan
Nein
Autonomie
Semi-autonomous
Integrationen
SAML SSO
Punkte im Detail
  • Fit for the job29/30
  • Autonomy13/20
  • Controls12/15
  • Integrations6/15
  • Access4/10
  • Evidence9/10

Platz 2

Legora

73

Law firms and in-house teams that want agentic workflows across research, review, and delivery.

Preis
Not published
Gratisplan
Nein
Autonomie
Semi-autonomous
Integrationen
Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook
Punkte im Detail
  • Fit for the job28/30
  • Autonomy13/20
  • Controls12/15
  • Integrations7/15
  • Access4/10
  • Evidence9/10

Platz 3

Spellbook

73

Law firms and in-house teams that negotiate contracts in Microsoft Word.

Preis
Not published
Gratisplan
Test
Autonomie
Semi-autonomous
Integrationen
Microsoft Word, Email, Slack
Punkte im Detail
  • Fit for the job27/30
  • Autonomy13/20
  • Controls12/15
  • Integrations8/15
  • Access4/10
  • Evidence9/10

Platz 4

Paxton

72

Litigation attorneys and small firms that want research and drafts tied to the case file.

Preis
$499 per user/month
Gratisplan
Nein
Autonomie
Copilot
Integrationen
DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word
Punkte im Detail
  • Fit for the job24/30
  • Autonomy9/20
  • Controls13/15
  • Integrations9/15
  • Access8/10
  • Evidence9/10

Platz 5

Clio

72

Law firms that want practice management, billing, and matter-aware AI in one system.

Preis
From $49/user/mo
Gratisplan
Test
Autonomie
Copilot
Integrationen
Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, QuickBooks
Punkte im Detail
  • Fit for the job23/30
  • Autonomy9/20
  • Controls13/15
  • Integrations10/15
  • Access8/10
  • Evidence9/10

Platz 6

CoCounsel

70

Firms and professional teams that want AI tied to Westlaw, Practical Law, or Checkpoint.

Preis
Not published
Gratisplan
Nein
Autonomie
Copilot
Integrationen
Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint
Punkte im Detail
  • Fit for the job26/30
  • Autonomy9/20
  • Controls13/15
  • Integrations9/15
  • Access4/10
  • Evidence9/10

Platz 7

Lexis+ AI

66

Attorneys who want drafting and research grounded in LexisNexis authority and Shepard's.

Preis
Not published
Gratisplan
Test
Autonomie
Copilot
Integrationen
Shepard's
Punkte im Detail
  • Fit for the job25/30
  • Autonomy9/20
  • Controls13/15
  • Integrations6/15
  • Access4/10
  • Evidence9/10

Platz 8

Eve

66

Personal injury and other plaintiff firms that want intake, medical review, and drafting in one system.

Preis
Not published
Gratisplan
Nein
Autonomie
Semi-autonomous
Integrationen
CMS
Punkte im Detail
  • Fit for the job22/30
  • Autonomy13/20
  • Controls12/15
  • Integrations6/15
  • Access4/10
  • Evidence9/10

Platz 9

EvenUp

65

Personal injury firms that want demands, medical review, and negotiation support from case files.

Preis
Not published
Gratisplan
Nein
Autonomie
Semi-autonomous
Integrationen
CMS
Punkte im Detail
  • Fit for the job21/30
  • Autonomy13/20
  • Controls12/15
  • Integrations6/15
  • Access4/10
  • Evidence9/10

Platz 10

Luminance

62

Enterprises that want contract review and portfolio insight beyond the legal department.

Preis
Not published
Gratisplan
Nein
Autonomie
Semi-autonomous
Integrationen
None named on the pages we opened
Punkte im Detail
  • Fit for the job20/30
  • Autonomy13/20
  • Controls12/15
  • Integrations4/15
  • Access4/10
  • Evidence9/10

Preise, Funktionen und Kurzprofile

  1. 1

    Harvey

    Large law firms and corporate legal departments running high-stakes work on one platform.

    Harvey is an AI platform for law firms and in-house teams, with agents, shared Spaces, a document Vault, contract intelligence, and a command center for usage. The site says more than 3,000 legal organizations use it and that default controls include SAML SSO, audit logs, IP allow-listing, and data lifecycle management.

    Preis
    Not published
    No price, plan, or free trial is listed on the homepage opened. Access is presented through the product site rather than a public rate card. Last checked 5 October 2026.
    Funktionen
    SAML SSO. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.

    Was Nutzer sagen

    Prozessanwälte auf r/biglaw sagen, Harvey reiche für Mandantenarbeit, wenn die Kanzlei keinen öffentlichen Chatbot erlaubt, und sie nennen Prüfung und Widerspruchssuche.

    Auf r/legaltech sagt ein Pilotnutzer, der Vertrieb sei schwer gewesen und das Produkt wirke wie eine dünne Oberfläche auf GPT. Die Klage ist der Preis, nicht eine fehlende Funktionsliste.

    • “I find Harvey invaluable in my work (I’m a litigator). I think that ChatGPT performs better, but Harvey is more than good enough, and we’re not authorized to use public models with client materials.”
      Reddit
    • “For the price, complete bullshit. the sales team oversells like crazy, but under the hood it’s just a thin UI on top of GPT with a prompt sheet and some document storage.”
      Reddit · u/tulumtimes2425

    Preis und Funktionen von Harvey/Alternativen zu Harvey

  2. 2

    Legora

    Law firms and in-house teams that want agentic workflows across research, review, and delivery.

    Legora describes itself as collaborative AI for lawyers, with the Legora aOS connecting information, communication, and execution of legal work. Its Agent plans, executes, reviews, and delivers work, and the product list includes a Word add-in, Outlook add-in, tabular review, legal research, and a portal.

    Preis
    Not published
    The homepage offers a demo and does not list a price, plan, free tier, or trial. The site cites SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, GDPR, and HIPAA, and says customer data is not used for AI training. Last checked 5 October 2026.
    Funktionen
    Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.

    Was Nutzer sagen

    Auf r/legaltech sagt ein Vergleich, Legora wirke für eine kleinere Kanzlei leichter als Harvey.

    Derselbe Kommentar nennt es begrenzter, und ein anderer sagt, eine große Kanzlei sollte es nicht kaufen.

    • “Legora looked a bit easier to use but also more limited.”
      Reddit
    • “Harvey is a waste, too high of a price. Legora apparently isn't Enterprise ready if you're at a large law firm.”
      Reddit

    Preis und Funktionen von Legora/Alternativen zu Legora

  3. 3

    Spellbook

    Law firms and in-house teams that negotiate contracts in Microsoft Word.

    Spellbook reviews and drafts contracts and applies playbooks, with intake from email and Slack and a Word add-in plus an Associate multi-document agent. The company says it is trusted by 5,000+ legal teams and lists SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, and zero data retention with LLM providers.

    Preis
    Not published
    Pricing is custom and based on the number of team members on the license. No dollar amount is published. A 7-day free trial is offered, with extended trials possible for larger organizations. Academic institutions can inquire about free access. Dedicated support is listed for teams over 10. Last checked 5 October 2026.
    Funktionen
    Microsoft Word, Email, Slack. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.

    Was Nutzer sagen

    Ein Kommentar auf r/biglaw von jemandem, der Harvey für kleinere Tools verließ, nennt Spellbook als einen der Landeplätze.

    Der Kommentar beschreibt keinen Spellbook-Fehler. Er sagt, das Ergebnis müsse man selbst prüfen.

    • “So I moved to smaller tools like Spellbook, AI Lawyer, and CoCounsel and it honestly felt like the same practical benefit with less fuss.”
      Reddit

    Preis und Funktionen von Spellbook/Alternativen zu Spellbook

  4. 4

    Paxton

    Litigation attorneys and small firms that want research and drafts tied to the case file.

    Paxton is AI for litigation teams that keeps the matter record, legal research, and drafting in one workspace, with citations to case files and authority. The site says it connects to a DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word, and Outlook, and that it is SOC 2, ISO, and HIPAA compliant.

    Preis
    $499 per user/month
    Individual is $499 per user/month, or $2,999 per user/year, which the page says saves 50% compared with monthly. Enterprise is custom volume-based pricing with firm-wide access, onboarding, and an account manager. The Individual plan includes US federal regulations, state laws, and case law across all 50 states. Last checked 5 October 2026.
    Funktionen
    DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.

    Preis und Funktionen von Paxton/Alternativen zu Paxton

  5. 5

    Clio

    Law firms that want practice management, billing, and matter-aware AI in one system.

    Clio Manage is practice-management software for matters, documents, time, billing, trust accounting, and client payments. The pricing page says AI is included on Core and above, grounded in the firm's matters, and that firm data is not used to train AI.

    Preis
    From $49/user/mo
    Clio's plans start at $49 USD per user per month. The four plans are Starter, Core, Signature, and Elite. Dollar prices above the $49 starting point were not listed on the page opened. AI features such as drafted bills, client updates, and scheduling are on Core and above. Accounting, including trust reconciliation, is included on every plan. Card payments are listed at 2.95% (3.75% American Express) and eCheck and ACH at 1%. The page title offers a free trial. Clio states SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, and 99.9% uptime. Last checked 5 October 2026.
    Funktionen
    Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, QuickBooks, Xero, TrustBooks. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.

    Preis und Funktionen von Clio/Alternativen zu Clio

  6. 6

    CoCounsel

    Firms and professional teams that want AI tied to Westlaw, Practical Law, or Checkpoint.

    CoCounsel is Thomson Reuters' AI for legal, tax, audit, compliance, and drafting work, grounded in its content and connected to Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint, Microsoft 365, and document-management partners. The company says customer content and prompts are not used to train CoCounsel or the underlying models, and that OpenAI and Google calls use zero-retention APIs.

    Preis
    Not published
    The CoCounsel product page opened does not list a dollar price or a free trial. A separate Thomson Reuters sales page, seen in search but not opened, says online pricing is available only for new law-firm customers with up to 10 attorneys. Last checked 5 October 2026.
    Funktionen
    Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint, Microsoft 365. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.

    Was Nutzer sagen

    Derselbe Kommentar auf r/biglaw stellt CoCounsel zu den kleineren Tools, die einen Harvey-Platz für den Alltagstext ersetzt haben.

    In dem Thread stand kein eigener CoCounsel-Fehler. Der gemeinsame Punkt ist, dass ein Mensch den Entwurf weiter prüft.

    • “Still have to review everything yourself either way.”
      Reddit

    Preis und Funktionen von CoCounsel/Alternativen zu CoCounsel

  7. 7

    Lexis+ AI

    Attorneys who want drafting and research grounded in LexisNexis authority and Shepard's.

    The Lexis+ with Protégé free-trial page, which describes the product formerly presented as Lexis+ AI, says it accelerates research, drafting, and analysis grounded in LexisNexis content and Shepard's citations. It also says general AI and legal AI can be used together in one secure workspace.

    Preis
    Not published
    The original product URL returned HTTP 403. The free-trial page that did open invites a Lexis+ with Protégé trial and does not list a price or trial length. A subscription dollar amount was not verified. Last checked 5 October 2026.
    Funktionen
    Shepard's. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.

    Preis und Funktionen von Lexis+ AI/Alternativen zu Lexis+ AI

  8. 8

    Eve

    Personal injury and other plaintiff firms that want intake, medical review, and drafting in one system.

    EveOS is an AI operating system for plaintiff law firms, covering intake, medical chronologies, demand letters, discovery, research, and a nightly auditor that reviews active matters. Eve says it is trusted by 1,200+ firms, is SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA compliant, and does not use case data to train shared models.

    Preis
    Not published
    The homepage offers a demo and a call. No dollar price, free tier, or trial length is listed. Last checked 5 October 2026.
    Funktionen
    CMS. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.

    Preis und Funktionen von Eve/Alternativen zu Eve

  9. 9

    EvenUp

    Personal injury firms that want demands, medical review, and negotiation support from case files.

    EvenUp is AI for personal injury firms covering intake, treatment tracking, demands, negotiation, discovery, and trial prep. The site says demands can be instant AI drafts or legal-reviewed drafts, cites a 250K+ verdict and settlement dataset, and says the company is SOC 2-audited and HIPAA-attested.

    Preis
    Not published
    No price, free tier, or trial is listed on the homepage opened. Last checked 5 October 2026.
    Funktionen
    CMS. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.

    Preis und Funktionen von EvenUp/Alternativen zu EvenUp

  10. 10

    Luminance

    Enterprises that want contract review and portfolio insight beyond the legal department.

    Luminance is a contract-intelligence platform for negotiating with playbooks, discovering risk and obligations across a portfolio, and automating workflows from intake to signature. It says it is used by 1,000+ enterprises and lists ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II.

    Preis
    Not published
    The homepage offers a demo and does not list a price, free tier, or trial. Last checked 5 October 2026.
    Funktionen
    None named on the pages we opened. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.

    Preis und Funktionen von Luminance/Alternativen zu Luminance

Was ist ein KI-Agent?

Juristische KI prüft Verträge, sucht Rechtsprechung und schreibt mit Beleg. Harvey, Spellbook und CoCounsel sind kein Verbraucher-Anwalt. Kanzleipreise sind oft individuell.

Wie diese Liste aufgebaut ist

Oben auf dieser Liste stehen Harvey, Legora, Spellbook. Die Reihenfolge folgt der veröffentlichten Punktzahl, nicht einer Anzeige.

Was Sie vergleichen sollten

Sehen Sie auf die Aufgabe, den Einstiegspreis und ob ein Mensch das Ergebnis noch freigibt.

  • Eine Aufgabe, die das Produkt wirklich erledigt
  • Ein veröffentlichter Preis, ein Gratisplan oder ein klar genannter individueller Preis
  • Eine Prüfung, bevor die Arbeit den Kunden erreicht

Wofür diese Software da ist

Sie lohnt sich, wenn derselbe Schritt sich wiederholt. Die Entscheidung bleibt bei einem Menschen.

  • Den Einstiegspreis vor einer Demo sehen
  • Produkte für diese Aufgabe vergleichen, nicht ein allgemeines Chatfenster
  • Die Produktseite für die längeren Notizen öffnen

Für wen diese Liste ist

Für Leute, die die Aufgabe schon kennen und die passenden Produkte wollen, mit Datum an den Preisen.

Veröffentlichte Einstiegspreise

Einstiegszahlen, die wir prüfen konnten: Harvey (Not published), Legora (Not published), Spellbook (Not published). Zuletzt geprüft am 5. Oktober 2026.

Wie Sie wählen

Zuerst die Aufgabe. Dann lesen Sie, für wen das Produkt ist und ob Sie ohne Verkaufsgespräch starten können.

Verwandte Kategorien

Nachbaraufgaben haben eine eigene Liste.

Fragen

Bewertungsmethode

Geprüft 5 October 2026

Jedes Produkt wird mit denselben sechs Teilen von 100 bewertet. Der Platz folgt der Summe, dann der Passung, dann dem Namen. Die ganze Methode lesen.