Skip to content

Prices last checked 5 October 2026

Best Legal AI Tools

Harvey, Legora, Spellbook, CoCounsel, Lexis+ AI, Eve, EvenUp, and Luminance do not publish a self-serve price. Paxton lists $499 per user a month. Clio's plans start at $49 per user a month, and Clio is practice management with AI features, not a research-only product. Checked 5 October 2026.

10 products. Prices and descriptions last checked 5 October 2026.

Best Legal AI Tools compared

Pricing is the vendor's published starting figure. A free plan or trial is listed only when the pricing page says so. User comments appear only when we could link a short quote. Otherwise the cell says there are no sourced comments.

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, free plan or trial, features, integrations, best fit, and sourced user comments
ProductPricingFree plan / trialKey featuresIntegrationsBest forWhat users say
Harvey

#1

Not publishedNot listedAI platform for law firms and in-house legal teams.SAML SSOLarge law firms and corporate legal departments running high-stakes work on one platform.

Litigators on r/biglaw say Harvey is good enough for client work when the firm will not allow a public chatbot, and they mention proofing and contradiction checks.

Reddit
Legora

#2

Not publishedNot listedCollaborative AI and an agentic operating system for legal work.Microsoft Word, Microsoft OutlookLaw firms and in-house teams that want agentic workflows across research, review, and delivery.

On r/legaltech, one comparison says Legora looked easier than Harvey for a smaller firm.

Reddit
Spellbook

#3

Not publishedTrialAI for contract review, drafting, and playbooks in Word.Microsoft Word, Email, SlackLaw firms and in-house teams that negotiate contracts in Microsoft Word.

A r/biglaw commenter who left Harvey for smaller tools names Spellbook as one of the places they landed.

Reddit
Paxton

#4

$499 per user/monthNot listedLitigation workspace for matter files, research, and drafts.DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word, Microsoft OutlookLitigation attorneys and small firms that want research and drafts tied to the case file.No sourced comments.
Clio

#5

From $49/user/moTrialLegal practice management with AI on Core plans and above.Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, QuickBooks, XeroLaw firms that want practice management, billing, and matter-aware AI in one system.No sourced comments.
CoCounsel

#6

Not publishedNot listedThomson Reuters AI for legal, tax, audit, and compliance work.Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint, Microsoft 365Firms and professional teams that want AI tied to Westlaw, Practical Law, or Checkpoint.

The same r/biglaw comment groups CoCounsel with the smaller tools that replaced a Harvey seat for everyday drafting.

Reddit
Lexis+ AI

#7

Not publishedTrialLegal AI for research, drafting, and analysis, now branded with Protégé.Shepard'sAttorneys who want drafting and research grounded in LexisNexis authority and Shepard's.No sourced comments.
Eve

#8

Not publishedNot listedAI operating system for plaintiff law firms.CMSPersonal injury and other plaintiff firms that want intake, medical review, and drafting in one system.No sourced comments.
EvenUp

#9

Not publishedNot listedProactive AI across the personal-injury case lifecycle.CMSPersonal injury firms that want demands, medical review, and negotiation support from case files.No sourced comments.
Luminance

#10

Not publishedNot listedContract intelligence for legal, procurement, finance, and the wider enterprise.None named on the pages we openedEnterprises that want contract review and portfolio insight beyond the legal department.No sourced comments.

Ranked list

Ranked on fit for this job, autonomy, controls, integrations, access, and how public the product is. Open a score to see the six parts.

Rank 1

Harvey

73

Large law firms and corporate legal departments running high-stakes work on one platform.

Pricing from
Not published
Free tier
No
Autonomy
Semi-autonomous
Integrations
SAML SSO
Score breakdown
  • Fit for the job29/30
  • Autonomy13/20
  • Controls12/15
  • Integrations6/15
  • Access4/10
  • Evidence9/10

Rank 2

Legora

73

Law firms and in-house teams that want agentic workflows across research, review, and delivery.

Pricing from
Not published
Free tier
No
Autonomy
Semi-autonomous
Integrations
Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook
Score breakdown
  • Fit for the job28/30
  • Autonomy13/20
  • Controls12/15
  • Integrations7/15
  • Access4/10
  • Evidence9/10

Rank 3

Spellbook

73

Law firms and in-house teams that negotiate contracts in Microsoft Word.

Pricing from
Not published
Free tier
Trial
Autonomy
Semi-autonomous
Integrations
Microsoft Word, Email, Slack
Score breakdown
  • Fit for the job27/30
  • Autonomy13/20
  • Controls12/15
  • Integrations8/15
  • Access4/10
  • Evidence9/10

Rank 4

Paxton

72

Litigation attorneys and small firms that want research and drafts tied to the case file.

Pricing from
$499 per user/month
Free tier
No
Autonomy
Copilot
Integrations
DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word
Score breakdown
  • Fit for the job24/30
  • Autonomy9/20
  • Controls13/15
  • Integrations9/15
  • Access8/10
  • Evidence9/10

Rank 5

Clio

72

Law firms that want practice management, billing, and matter-aware AI in one system.

Pricing from
From $49/user/mo
Free tier
Trial
Autonomy
Copilot
Integrations
Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, QuickBooks
Score breakdown
  • Fit for the job23/30
  • Autonomy9/20
  • Controls13/15
  • Integrations10/15
  • Access8/10
  • Evidence9/10

Rank 6

CoCounsel

70

Firms and professional teams that want AI tied to Westlaw, Practical Law, or Checkpoint.

Pricing from
Not published
Free tier
No
Autonomy
Copilot
Integrations
Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint
Score breakdown
  • Fit for the job26/30
  • Autonomy9/20
  • Controls13/15
  • Integrations9/15
  • Access4/10
  • Evidence9/10

Rank 7

Lexis+ AI

66

Attorneys who want drafting and research grounded in LexisNexis authority and Shepard's.

Pricing from
Not published
Free tier
Trial
Autonomy
Copilot
Integrations
Shepard's
Score breakdown
  • Fit for the job25/30
  • Autonomy9/20
  • Controls13/15
  • Integrations6/15
  • Access4/10
  • Evidence9/10

Rank 8

Eve

66

Personal injury and other plaintiff firms that want intake, medical review, and drafting in one system.

Pricing from
Not published
Free tier
No
Autonomy
Semi-autonomous
Integrations
CMS
Score breakdown
  • Fit for the job22/30
  • Autonomy13/20
  • Controls12/15
  • Integrations6/15
  • Access4/10
  • Evidence9/10

Rank 9

EvenUp

65

Personal injury firms that want demands, medical review, and negotiation support from case files.

Pricing from
Not published
Free tier
No
Autonomy
Semi-autonomous
Integrations
CMS
Score breakdown
  • Fit for the job21/30
  • Autonomy13/20
  • Controls12/15
  • Integrations6/15
  • Access4/10
  • Evidence9/10

Rank 10

Luminance

62

Enterprises that want contract review and portfolio insight beyond the legal department.

Pricing from
Not published
Free tier
No
Autonomy
Semi-autonomous
Integrations
None named on the pages we opened
Score breakdown
  • Fit for the job20/30
  • Autonomy13/20
  • Controls12/15
  • Integrations4/15
  • Access4/10
  • Evidence9/10

Pricing, features, and summaries

  1. 1

    Harvey

    Large law firms and corporate legal departments running high-stakes work on one platform.

    Harvey is an AI platform for law firms and in-house teams, with agents, shared Spaces, a document Vault, contract intelligence, and a command center for usage. The site says more than 3,000 legal organizations use it and that default controls include SAML SSO, audit logs, IP allow-listing, and data lifecycle management.

    Pricing
    Not published
    No price, plan, or free trial is listed on the homepage opened. Access is presented through the product site rather than a public rate card. Last checked 5 October 2026.
    Key features
    SAML SSO. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.

    What users say

    Litigators on r/biglaw say Harvey is good enough for client work when the firm will not allow a public chatbot, and they mention proofing and contradiction checks.

    On r/legaltech, a pilot user says the sales motion was heavy and the product felt like a thin interface on GPT. Price is the complaint, not a missing feature list.

    • “I find Harvey invaluable in my work (I’m a litigator). I think that ChatGPT performs better, but Harvey is more than good enough, and we’re not authorized to use public models with client materials.”
      Reddit
    • “For the price, complete bullshit. the sales team oversells like crazy, but under the hood it’s just a thin UI on top of GPT with a prompt sheet and some document storage.”
      Reddit · u/tulumtimes2425

    Harvey pricing and features/Harvey alternatives

  2. 2

    Legora

    Law firms and in-house teams that want agentic workflows across research, review, and delivery.

    Legora describes itself as collaborative AI for lawyers, with the Legora aOS connecting information, communication, and execution of legal work. Its Agent plans, executes, reviews, and delivers work, and the product list includes a Word add-in, Outlook add-in, tabular review, legal research, and a portal.

    Pricing
    Not published
    The homepage offers a demo and does not list a price, plan, free tier, or trial. The site cites SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, GDPR, and HIPAA, and says customer data is not used for AI training. Last checked 5 October 2026.
    Key features
    Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.

    What users say

    On r/legaltech, one comparison says Legora looked easier than Harvey for a smaller firm.

    The same comment calls it more limited, and another says it is not what a large firm should buy.

    • “Legora looked a bit easier to use but also more limited.”
      Reddit
    • “Harvey is a waste, too high of a price. Legora apparently isn't Enterprise ready if you're at a large law firm.”
      Reddit

    Legora pricing and features/Legora alternatives

  3. 3

    Spellbook

    Law firms and in-house teams that negotiate contracts in Microsoft Word.

    Spellbook reviews and drafts contracts and applies playbooks, with intake from email and Slack and a Word add-in plus an Associate multi-document agent. The company says it is trusted by 5,000+ legal teams and lists SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, and zero data retention with LLM providers.

    Pricing
    Not published
    Pricing is custom and based on the number of team members on the license. No dollar amount is published. A 7-day free trial is offered, with extended trials possible for larger organizations. Academic institutions can inquire about free access. Dedicated support is listed for teams over 10. Last checked 5 October 2026.
    Key features
    Microsoft Word, Email, Slack. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.

    What users say

    A r/biglaw commenter who left Harvey for smaller tools names Spellbook as one of the places they landed.

    That comment does not describe a Spellbook failure. It says you still have to review the output yourself.

    • “So I moved to smaller tools like Spellbook, AI Lawyer, and CoCounsel and it honestly felt like the same practical benefit with less fuss.”
      Reddit

    Spellbook pricing and features/Spellbook alternatives

  4. 4

    Paxton

    Litigation attorneys and small firms that want research and drafts tied to the case file.

    Paxton is AI for litigation teams that keeps the matter record, legal research, and drafting in one workspace, with citations to case files and authority. The site says it connects to a DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word, and Outlook, and that it is SOC 2, ISO, and HIPAA compliant.

    Pricing
    $499 per user/month
    Individual is $499 per user/month, or $2,999 per user/year, which the page says saves 50% compared with monthly. Enterprise is custom volume-based pricing with firm-wide access, onboarding, and an account manager. The Individual plan includes US federal regulations, state laws, and case law across all 50 states. Last checked 5 October 2026.
    Key features
    DMS, Claude, Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.

    Paxton pricing and features/Paxton alternatives

  5. 5

    Clio

    Law firms that want practice management, billing, and matter-aware AI in one system.

    Clio Manage is practice-management software for matters, documents, time, billing, trust accounting, and client payments. The pricing page says AI is included on Core and above, grounded in the firm's matters, and that firm data is not used to train AI.

    Pricing
    From $49/user/mo
    Clio's plans start at $49 USD per user per month. The four plans are Starter, Core, Signature, and Elite. Dollar prices above the $49 starting point were not listed on the page opened. AI features such as drafted bills, client updates, and scheduling are on Core and above. Accounting, including trust reconciliation, is included on every plan. Card payments are listed at 2.95% (3.75% American Express) and eCheck and ACH at 1%. The page title offers a free trial. Clio states SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, and 99.9% uptime. Last checked 5 October 2026.
    Key features
    Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, QuickBooks, Xero, TrustBooks. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.

    Clio pricing and features/Clio alternatives

  6. 6

    CoCounsel

    Firms and professional teams that want AI tied to Westlaw, Practical Law, or Checkpoint.

    CoCounsel is Thomson Reuters' AI for legal, tax, audit, compliance, and drafting work, grounded in its content and connected to Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint, Microsoft 365, and document-management partners. The company says customer content and prompts are not used to train CoCounsel or the underlying models, and that OpenAI and Google calls use zero-retention APIs.

    Pricing
    Not published
    The CoCounsel product page opened does not list a dollar price or a free trial. A separate Thomson Reuters sales page, seen in search but not opened, says online pricing is available only for new law-firm customers with up to 10 attorneys. Last checked 5 October 2026.
    Key features
    Westlaw, Practical Law, Checkpoint, Microsoft 365. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.

    What users say

    The same r/biglaw comment groups CoCounsel with the smaller tools that replaced a Harvey seat for everyday drafting.

    We did not read a separate CoCounsel failure in that thread. The shared point is that a person still checks the draft.

    • “Still have to review everything yourself either way.”
      Reddit

    CoCounsel pricing and features/CoCounsel alternatives

  7. 7

    Lexis+ AI

    Attorneys who want drafting and research grounded in LexisNexis authority and Shepard's.

    The Lexis+ with Protégé free-trial page, which describes the product formerly presented as Lexis+ AI, says it accelerates research, drafting, and analysis grounded in LexisNexis content and Shepard's citations. It also says general AI and legal AI can be used together in one secure workspace.

    Pricing
    Not published
    The original product URL returned HTTP 403. The free-trial page that did open invites a Lexis+ with Protégé trial and does not list a price or trial length. A subscription dollar amount was not verified. Last checked 5 October 2026.
    Key features
    Shepard's. A person drives. The product drafts, searches, or suggests inside a workflow you already run.

    Lexis+ AI pricing and features/Lexis+ AI alternatives

  8. 8

    Eve

    Personal injury and other plaintiff firms that want intake, medical review, and drafting in one system.

    EveOS is an AI operating system for plaintiff law firms, covering intake, medical chronologies, demand letters, discovery, research, and a nightly auditor that reviews active matters. Eve says it is trusted by 1,200+ firms, is SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA compliant, and does not use case data to train shared models.

    Pricing
    Not published
    The homepage offers a demo and a call. No dollar price, free tier, or trial length is listed. Last checked 5 October 2026.
    Key features
    CMS. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.

    Eve pricing and features/Eve alternatives

  9. 9

    EvenUp

    Personal injury firms that want demands, medical review, and negotiation support from case files.

    EvenUp is AI for personal injury firms covering intake, treatment tracking, demands, negotiation, discovery, and trial prep. The site says demands can be instant AI drafts or legal-reviewed drafts, cites a 250K+ verdict and settlement dataset, and says the company is SOC 2-audited and HIPAA-attested.

    Pricing
    Not published
    No price, free tier, or trial is listed on the homepage opened. Last checked 5 October 2026.
    Key features
    CMS. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.

    EvenUp pricing and features/EvenUp alternatives

  10. 10

    Luminance

    Enterprises that want contract review and portfolio insight beyond the legal department.

    Luminance is a contract-intelligence platform for negotiating with playbooks, discovering risk and obligations across a portfolio, and automating workflows from intake to signature. It says it is used by 1,000+ enterprises and lists ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II.

    Pricing
    Not published
    The homepage offers a demo and does not list a price, free tier, or trial. Last checked 5 October 2026.
    Key features
    None named on the pages we opened. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.

    Luminance pricing and features/Luminance alternatives

What are legal AI tools?

Legal AI tools draft, review, research, or manage matters. An AI legal assistant for a large firm is usually a closed system, so client documents are not pasted into a public chatbot. AI for lawyers also covers practice management, which is a different product.

AI contract review and AI legal research are slices of the same shelf. The consumer phrase "AI lawyer" is a different search, full of news and app stores, and it is not this list.

How an AI legal assistant works

A lawyer uploads a document or asks a research question inside a system the firm has approved. The product drafts, cites, or flags a clause. A person still signs the work. Harvey, Legora, Spellbook, CoCounsel, and Lexis+ AI are the sales-led end of that. Paxton publishes $499 per user a month. Clio starts at $49 per user a month and is practice management with AI features, not a research-only product.

Eve, EvenUp, and Luminance did not publish a self-serve price on the pages we opened.

Features to look for in AI for lawyers

The document has to stay in a system the firm allows, and a person still has to sign.

  • A place to put client documents that is not a public chat
  • Drafting or review, with a person still signing the work
  • A price, or a clear statement that pricing is a contract

Benefits of AI contract review

Lawyers get a system the firm has approved, and you can tell research products from the practice-management bill.

  • Give lawyers a system the firm has approved
  • Separate research products from practice-management products
  • Walk into a pilot knowing the price is custom, when it is

Who uses legal AI tools

Firm innovation teams and lawyers who have been told they cannot paste client work into a consumer chatbot. Solo and small-firm buyers who need a published number should look at Paxton or Clio and read what each one actually is.

Legal AI pricing

Harvey, Legora, Spellbook, CoCounsel, Lexis+ AI, Eve, EvenUp, and Luminance do not publish a self-serve price. Paxton lists $499 per user a month. Clio's plans start at $49 per user a month. Last checked 5 October 2026.

Public comments describe Harvey pilots that started with a demand for dozens of lawyers. That is a contract, not a seat you add on a card form.

How to choose the best legal AI

If you need a number, Paxton and Clio are the ones that published one, and they are different products. If you are a large firm comparing Harvey, Legora, CoCounsel, or Lexis+ AI, budget for a pilot and a minimum seat count.

Do not treat Clio's $49 as the price of Harvey. One is practice management. The other is a research and drafting pilot.

Related categories

Nearby jobs have their own lists. Open one when this page is only part of the work.

FAQ

Scoring method

Last verified 5 October 2026

Every product is scored out of 100 on the same six parts. Rank follows the total, then job fit, then name. The parts are shown on each row. Read the full method.