Melhores ferramentas de pentest com IA
O pentest com IA procura falhas exploráveis e deixa a prova. XBOW e Pentera são o produto. O preço do NodeZero que citamos é o da AWS Marketplace.
9 produtos. Preços e fichas conferidos em 5 de outubro de 2026.
Melhores ferramentas de pentest com IA comparados
O preço é o valor inicial publicado pelo fornecedor. Plano grátis ou teste só entram se a página de preços disser isso.
| Produto | Preço | Plano grátis ou teste | Recursos | Integrações | Para quem | O que dizem |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dropzone AI #1 | Not published | Não consta | Agentic SOC for alert investigation and threat hunting. | Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, Microsoft Defender, CrowdStrike | SOC teams that want machine-scale alert investigation and hunting without replacing analysts. | Sem comentários citados. |
| Horizon3.ai NodeZero #2 | From $25,000 / 12 months on AWS Marketplace | Não consta | Autonomous production attack-path testing. | None named on the pages we opened | Teams that want continuous internal, cloud, and identity attack-path validation in production. | Um comentário no r/Pentesting descreve o nível padrão do NodeZero como teste contínuo com preço por ativo, com espaço para negociar. Reddit · u/MouseMajor1337 |
| Aikido #3 | Free | Plano grátis | Autonomous security from code to production. | Jira, Linear, Drata, Vanta | Engineering teams that want AppSec findings turned into pull requests, plus proof of what is exploitable. | Sem comentários citados. |
| XBOW #4 | Not published | Não consta | Autonomous offensive security that proves exploitability. | None named on the pages we opened | Security teams that want continuous, proof-of-exploit testing of web apps and APIs. | No r/Pentesting, um comentário junta o XBOW às ferramentas que atacam a aplicação em execução, o que prefere a scanners de código vendidos como pentest. Reddit · u/danielrabinovich |
| Pentera #5 | Not published | Não consta | AI exposure validation with remediation and retesting. | None named on the pages we opened | Enterprises that want validated attack paths and a retest after remediation. | Sem comentários citados. |
| RunSybil #6 | Not published | Não consta | Continuous offensive testing across the stack. | None named on the pages we opened | Product teams that want pentest-style findings on each deployment instead of an annual test. | Sem comentários citados. |
| Prophet Security #7 | Not published | Não consta | Agentic AI SOC analyst, hunter, and detection engineer. | None named on the pages we opened | SOCs that want every alert investigated and still want a human check on malicious verdicts. | Sem comentários citados. |
| Torq #8 | Not published | Não consta | AI SOC platform for triage, investigation, and response. | None named on the pages we opened | Security operations teams that want agentic response with an override still available. | Sem comentários citados. |
| Intezer #9 | Not published | Não consta | AI SOC that investigates every alert. | None named on the pages we opened | Enterprise SOCs that want forensic triage of the full alert queue. | Sem comentários citados. |
Lista ordenada
A ordem olha o encaixe com o trabalho, a autonomia, os controles, as integrações, o acesso e o quanto o produto é público.
| # | Agente | Para quem | Preço | Plano grátis | Autonomia | Integrações | Pontuação |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dropzone AI | SOC teams that want machine-scale alert investigation and hunting without replacing analysts. | Not published | Não | Semi-autonomous | Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, Microsoft Defender +5 | Detalhe da nota78
|
| 2 | Horizon3.ai NodeZero | Teams that want continuous internal, cloud, and identity attack-path validation in production. | From $25,000 / 12 months on AWS Marketplace | Não | Autonomous | None named on the pages we opened | Detalhe da nota77
|
| 3 | Aikido | Engineering teams that want AppSec findings turned into pull requests, plus proof of what is exploitable. | Free | Sim | Autonomous | Jira, Linear, Drata +1 | Detalhe da nota77
|
| 4 | XBOW | Security teams that want continuous, proof-of-exploit testing of web apps and APIs. | Not published | Não | Autonomous | None named on the pages we opened | Detalhe da nota74
|
| 5 | Pentera | Enterprises that want validated attack paths and a retest after remediation. | Not published | Não | Autonomous | None named on the pages we opened | Detalhe da nota72
|
| 6 | RunSybil | Product teams that want pentest-style findings on each deployment instead of an annual test. | Not published | Não | Autonomous | None named on the pages we opened | Detalhe da nota71
|
| 7 | Prophet Security | SOCs that want every alert investigated and still want a human check on malicious verdicts. | Not published | Não | Semi-autonomous | None named on the pages we opened | Detalhe da nota66
|
| 8 | Torq | Security operations teams that want agentic response with an override still available. | Not published | Não | Semi-autonomous | None named on the pages we opened | Detalhe da nota65
|
| 9 | Intezer | Enterprise SOCs that want forensic triage of the full alert queue. | Not published | Não | Semi-autonomous | None named on the pages we opened | Detalhe da nota64
|
Posição 1
Dropzone AI78
SOC teams that want machine-scale alert investigation and hunting without replacing analysts.
- Preço
- Not published
- Plano grátis
- Não
- Autonomia
- Semi-autonomous
- Integrações
- Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, Microsoft Defender
Detalhe da nota78
- Fit for the job25/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations15/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Posição 2
Horizon3.ai NodeZero77
Teams that want continuous internal, cloud, and identity attack-path validation in production.
- Preço
- From $25,000 / 12 months on AWS Marketplace
- Plano grátis
- Não
- Autonomia
- Autonomous
- Integrações
- None named on the pages we opened
Detalhe da nota77
- Fit for the job28/30
- Autonomy17/20
- Controls11/15
- Integrations4/15
- Access8/10
- Evidence9/10
Posição 3
Aikido77
Engineering teams that want AppSec findings turned into pull requests, plus proof of what is exploitable.
- Preço
- Free
- Plano grátis
- Sim
- Autonomia
- Autonomous
- Integrações
- Jira, Linear, Drata
Detalhe da nota77
- Fit for the job21/30
- Autonomy17/20
- Controls11/15
- Integrations9/15
- Access10/10
- Evidence9/10
Posição 4
XBOW74
Security teams that want continuous, proof-of-exploit testing of web apps and APIs.
- Preço
- Not published
- Plano grátis
- Não
- Autonomia
- Autonomous
- Integrações
- None named on the pages we opened
Detalhe da nota74
- Fit for the job29/30
- Autonomy17/20
- Controls11/15
- Integrations4/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Posição 5
Pentera72
Enterprises that want validated attack paths and a retest after remediation.
- Preço
- Not published
- Plano grátis
- Não
- Autonomia
- Autonomous
- Integrações
- None named on the pages we opened
Detalhe da nota72
- Fit for the job27/30
- Autonomy17/20
- Controls11/15
- Integrations4/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Posição 6
RunSybil71
Product teams that want pentest-style findings on each deployment instead of an annual test.
- Preço
- Not published
- Plano grátis
- Não
- Autonomia
- Autonomous
- Integrações
- None named on the pages we opened
Detalhe da nota71
- Fit for the job26/30
- Autonomy17/20
- Controls11/15
- Integrations4/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Posição 7
Prophet Security66
SOCs that want every alert investigated and still want a human check on malicious verdicts.
- Preço
- Not published
- Plano grátis
- Não
- Autonomia
- Semi-autonomous
- Integrações
- None named on the pages we opened
Detalhe da nota66
- Fit for the job24/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations4/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Posição 8
Torq65
Security operations teams that want agentic response with an override still available.
- Preço
- Not published
- Plano grátis
- Não
- Autonomia
- Semi-autonomous
- Integrações
- None named on the pages we opened
Detalhe da nota65
- Fit for the job23/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations4/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Posição 9
Intezer64
Enterprise SOCs that want forensic triage of the full alert queue.
- Preço
- Not published
- Plano grátis
- Não
- Autonomia
- Semi-autonomous
- Integrações
- None named on the pages we opened
Detalhe da nota64
- Fit for the job22/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations4/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Preços, recursos e fichas
1
Dropzone AI
SOC teams that want machine-scale alert investigation and hunting without replacing analysts.
Dropzone AI is an agentic SOC platform whose AI SOC Analyst investigates alerts across the existing tool stack and whose AI Threat Hunter runs hypothesis-driven hunts. The site says it ships with 90-plus integrations across SIEM, EDR, cloud, identity, and email, and that analysts set strategy and authorize containment.
- Preço
- Not published
- The homepage offers a self-guided demo and does not list a price. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Recursos
- Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, Microsoft Defender, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Okta, Google Workspace, Panther. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
2
Horizon3.ai NodeZero
Teams that want continuous internal, cloud, and identity attack-path validation in production.
Horizon3.ai's NodeZero autonomously runs real attack techniques in production without agents, then shows how an attacker would move and what to fix. The company says NodeZero is not a scanner and that it has recorded zero downtime across its production tests.
- Preço
- From $25,000 / 12 months on AWS Marketplace
- horizon3.ai does not list a price. AWS Marketplace lists a 12-month NodeZero Core package for 500 assets at $25,000, Pro at $32,500, and Elite at $42,500. Flex, a one-time test of 1,000 assets, is $15,000. A comment on the linked r/Pentesting thread says standard-tier MSRP is $50 per asset and Flex is $15 per asset, which matches that list math, but the contract prices above are the ones on the marketplace page. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Recursos
- None named on the pages we opened. Sold to run the job rather than wait for a prompt on every step. Keep a way to stop it before it reaches a customer, a candidate, or a filing.
O que dizem
Um comentário no r/Pentesting descreve o nível padrão do NodeZero como teste contínuo com preço por ativo, com espaço para negociar.
No r/cybersecurity, quem usou o NodeZero chamou de decepcionante, fraco em apps web e barulhento depois de um ponto de apoio. Tratam como complemento de um tester humano.
“I'd disagree, I was a bit disappointed with NodeZero. A comparison to Burp isn't even realistic though, since NZ doesn't have web app capabilities at this point (unless it's a public PoC for a particular software).”
Reddit · u/MouseMajor1337“H3's standard tier MSRP is $50 per asset, but that price can be negotiated. Standard tier gets you continuous (unlimited) testing for all Assets along with other features.”
Reddit · u/FrerBear
Preço e recursos de Horizon3.ai NodeZero/Alternativas ao Horizon3.ai NodeZero
3
Aikido
Engineering teams that want AppSec findings turned into pull requests, plus proof of what is exploitable.
Aikido is a developer security platform that scans code, dependencies, secrets, and cloud, and runs agents that detect issues, open fix pull requests, deploy to staging, and verify the fix. Its Attack product autonomously attacks running applications, APIs, and infrastructure to prove what is exploitable.
- Preço
- Free
- The Developer plan is $0 forever, includes 2 users, and requires no credit card. Limits on that plan include 10 repos, 2 container images, 1 domain, 1 cloud account, 10 AI AutoFixes a month, and 250,000 protected requests a month. The Basic card is labeled 300/month and the Pro and Advanced cards are labeled 600/month, each including 10 users; the currency symbol did not appear beside those three figures in the page text. The same page lists a typical pentest at $4,000 per assessment. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Recursos
- Jira, Linear, Drata, Vanta. Sold to run the job rather than wait for a prompt on every step. Keep a way to stop it before it reaches a customer, a candidate, or a filing.
4
XBOW
Security teams that want continuous, proof-of-exploit testing of web apps and APIs.
XBOW is an autonomous offensive security platform that explores applications and APIs, chains vulnerabilities into working attacks, and proves exploitability before a finding reaches the team. The company says more than 150 security teams use it, and that it was the first autonomous system to rank number one on HackerOne in June 2025.
- Preço
- Not published
- The pricing page says pricing is scoped to the environment and is usage-based, scaling with coverage rather than a fixed annual engagement. No dollar amount is listed. XBOW says it is also sold through AWS, Google, Oracle, and Microsoft marketplaces. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Recursos
- None named on the pages we opened. Sold to run the job rather than wait for a prompt on every step. Keep a way to stop it before it reaches a customer, a candidate, or a filing.
O que dizem
No r/Pentesting, um comentário junta o XBOW às ferramentas que atacam a aplicação em execução, o que prefere a scanners de código vendidos como pentest.
Esse tópico desconfia da categoria. Não descreve um erro nomeado do XBOW.
“You should be choosing a tool that actually tests in runtime. Aka software like xbow, mindfort, etc.”
Reddit · u/danielrabinovich
5
Pentera
Enterprises that want validated attack paths and a retest after remediation.
Pentera is an exposure-validation platform that emulates real attacks in live production, prioritizes what is exploitable, and can orchestrate remediation and retest the fix. It says it covers internal networks, external assets, cloud, and hybrid environments and supports all five stages of continuous threat exposure management.
- Preço
- Not published
- No price is shown on the homepage that loaded. The page asks visitors to request a personalized demo. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Recursos
- None named on the pages we opened. Sold to run the job rather than wait for a prompt on every step. Keep a way to stop it before it reaches a customer, a candidate, or a filing.
6
RunSybil
Product teams that want pentest-style findings on each deployment instead of an annual test.
RunSybil is an AI offensive-security platform that tests applications and infrastructure by reasoning about the system the way a human researcher would, on every deployment. It says it covers code, APIs, cloud, and infrastructure, including business-logic and multi-tenant issues, and that it validates whether exposures are actually exploitable.
- Preço
- Not published
- The homepage says Sybil replaces bug bounties and point-in-time pentests with predictable cost. No price or plan is listed. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Recursos
- None named on the pages we opened. Sold to run the job rather than wait for a prompt on every step. Keep a way to stop it before it reaches a customer, a candidate, or a filing.
7
Prophet Security
SOCs that want every alert investigated and still want a human check on malicious verdicts.
Prophet AI investigates alerts, hunts threats, and ships tuned or new detections that are backtested for approval. Response can run through scoped agent actions autonomously or with a sign-off, and a human Watchtower reviews malicious determinations around the clock.
- Preço
- Not published
- The homepage does not list a price. It says the product deploys as a dedicated single-tenant environment with a bring-your-own-key option. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Recursos
- None named on the pages we opened. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
Preço e recursos de Prophet Security/Alternativas ao Prophet Security
8
Torq
Security operations teams that want agentic response with an override still available.
Torq's AI SOC platform triages events, investigates cases with specialized agents, and can respond either autonomously or with a human in the loop. Its Socrates agent is described as natural-language agentic AI that remediates critical threats, and every decision is written to a context model with an audit trail.
- Preço
- Not published
- The homepage does not list a price. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Recursos
- None named on the pages we opened. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
9
Intezer
Enterprise SOCs that want forensic triage of the full alert queue.
Intezer's AI SOC triages, investigates, and can respond to alerts, including low-severity ones, using endpoint forensics, memory analysis, and reverse engineering alongside AI models. The site says it resolves more than 98 percent of false positives in under a minute and prices by endpoint rather than by alert volume.
- Preço
- Not published
- The homepage says pricing is endpoint-based and predictable, with no volume fees. No dollar amount or plan card is shown. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Recursos
- None named on the pages we opened. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
O que é um agente de IA
O pentest com IA procura falhas exploráveis e deixa a prova. XBOW e Pentera são o produto. O preço do NodeZero que citamos é o da AWS Marketplace.
Como esta lista está organizada
No topo desta lista estão Dropzone AI, Horizon3.ai NodeZero, Aikido. A ordem segue a pontuação publicada, não um anúncio.
O que comparar
Olhe o trabalho, o preço de entrada e se uma pessoa ainda aprova o resultado.
- Um trabalho que o produto faz de fato
- Um preço publicado, um plano grátis ou um preço sob consulta dito com clareza
- Uma revisão antes de o trabalho chegar ao cliente
Para que serve este tipo de software
Serve quando o mesmo passo se repete. A decisão continua com uma pessoa.
- Ver o preço de entrada antes de uma demo
- Comparar produtos deste trabalho, não uma janela de chat genérica
- Abrir a ficha para as notas mais longas
Para quem é esta lista
Para quem já conhece o trabalho e quer os produtos que o fazem, com data nos preços.
Preços de entrada publicados
Números de entrada que conseguimos conferir: Dropzone AI (Not published), Horizon3.ai NodeZero (From $25,000 / 12 months on AWS Marketplace), Aikido (Free). Conferido em 5 de outubro de 2026.
Como escolher
Encaixe o trabalho primeiro. Depois veja para quem o produto serve e se dá para começar sem uma ligação de vendas.
Categorias relacionadas
Trabalhos vizinhos têm a própria lista.
Perguntas frequentes
Método de pontuação
Conferido 5 October 2026
Cada produto recebe uma nota de 0 a 100 nas mesmas seis partes. A posição segue o total, depois o encaixe e depois o nome. Ler o método completo.