Beste KI-Pentest-Tools
KI-Pentest sucht ausnutzbare Lücken und lässt den Beleg da. XBOW und Pentera sind das Produkt. Der NodeZero-Preis, den wir nennen, steht im AWS Marketplace.
9 Produkte. Preise und Texte zuletzt geprüft am 5. Oktober 2026.
Beste KI-Pentest-Tools im Vergleich
Der Preis ist der veröffentlichte Startpreis des Anbieters. Ein Gratisplan oder Test steht nur da, wenn die Preisseite das sagt.
| Produkt | Preis | Gratisplan oder Test | Funktionen | Integrationen | Geeignet für | Was Nutzer sagen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dropzone AI #1 | Not published | Nicht angegeben | Agentic SOC for alert investigation and threat hunting. | Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, Microsoft Defender, CrowdStrike | SOC teams that want machine-scale alert investigation and hunting without replacing analysts. | Keine belegte Aussage. |
| Horizon3.ai NodeZero #2 | From $25,000 / 12 months on AWS Marketplace | Nicht angegeben | Autonomous production attack-path testing. | None named on the pages we opened | Teams that want continuous internal, cloud, and identity attack-path validation in production. | Ein Kommentar auf r/Pentesting beschreibt die Standardstufe von NodeZero als fortlaufende Tests zum Preis pro Asset, mit Verhandlungsspielraum. Reddit · u/MouseMajor1337 |
| Aikido #3 | Free | Gratisplan | Autonomous security from code to production. | Jira, Linear, Drata, Vanta | Engineering teams that want AppSec findings turned into pull requests, plus proof of what is exploitable. | Keine belegte Aussage. |
| XBOW #4 | Not published | Nicht angegeben | Autonomous offensive security that proves exploitability. | None named on the pages we opened | Security teams that want continuous, proof-of-exploit testing of web apps and APIs. | Auf r/Pentesting stellt ein Kommentar XBOW zu Tools, die die laufende Anwendung angreifen, was er Code-Scannern vorzieht, die als Pentest verkauft werden. Reddit · u/danielrabinovich |
| Pentera #5 | Not published | Nicht angegeben | AI exposure validation with remediation and retesting. | None named on the pages we opened | Enterprises that want validated attack paths and a retest after remediation. | Keine belegte Aussage. |
| RunSybil #6 | Not published | Nicht angegeben | Continuous offensive testing across the stack. | None named on the pages we opened | Product teams that want pentest-style findings on each deployment instead of an annual test. | Keine belegte Aussage. |
| Prophet Security #7 | Not published | Nicht angegeben | Agentic AI SOC analyst, hunter, and detection engineer. | None named on the pages we opened | SOCs that want every alert investigated and still want a human check on malicious verdicts. | Keine belegte Aussage. |
| Torq #8 | Not published | Nicht angegeben | AI SOC platform for triage, investigation, and response. | None named on the pages we opened | Security operations teams that want agentic response with an override still available. | Keine belegte Aussage. |
| Intezer #9 | Not published | Nicht angegeben | AI SOC that investigates every alert. | None named on the pages we opened | Enterprise SOCs that want forensic triage of the full alert queue. | Keine belegte Aussage. |
Rangliste
Die Reihenfolge achtet auf Passung, Autonomie, Kontrolle, Integrationen, Zugang und wie öffentlich das Produkt ist.
| # | Agent | Geeignet für | Preis | Gratisplan | Autonomie | Integrationen | Punktzahl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dropzone AI | SOC teams that want machine-scale alert investigation and hunting without replacing analysts. | Not published | Nein | Semi-autonomous | Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, Microsoft Defender +5 | Punkte im Detail78
|
| 2 | Horizon3.ai NodeZero | Teams that want continuous internal, cloud, and identity attack-path validation in production. | From $25,000 / 12 months on AWS Marketplace | Nein | Autonomous | None named on the pages we opened | Punkte im Detail77
|
| 3 | Aikido | Engineering teams that want AppSec findings turned into pull requests, plus proof of what is exploitable. | Free | Ja | Autonomous | Jira, Linear, Drata +1 | Punkte im Detail77
|
| 4 | XBOW | Security teams that want continuous, proof-of-exploit testing of web apps and APIs. | Not published | Nein | Autonomous | None named on the pages we opened | Punkte im Detail74
|
| 5 | Pentera | Enterprises that want validated attack paths and a retest after remediation. | Not published | Nein | Autonomous | None named on the pages we opened | Punkte im Detail72
|
| 6 | RunSybil | Product teams that want pentest-style findings on each deployment instead of an annual test. | Not published | Nein | Autonomous | None named on the pages we opened | Punkte im Detail71
|
| 7 | Prophet Security | SOCs that want every alert investigated and still want a human check on malicious verdicts. | Not published | Nein | Semi-autonomous | None named on the pages we opened | Punkte im Detail66
|
| 8 | Torq | Security operations teams that want agentic response with an override still available. | Not published | Nein | Semi-autonomous | None named on the pages we opened | Punkte im Detail65
|
| 9 | Intezer | Enterprise SOCs that want forensic triage of the full alert queue. | Not published | Nein | Semi-autonomous | None named on the pages we opened | Punkte im Detail64
|
Platz 1
Dropzone AI78
SOC teams that want machine-scale alert investigation and hunting without replacing analysts.
- Preis
- Not published
- Gratisplan
- Nein
- Autonomie
- Semi-autonomous
- Integrationen
- Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, Microsoft Defender
Punkte im Detail78
- Fit for the job25/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations15/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Platz 2
Horizon3.ai NodeZero77
Teams that want continuous internal, cloud, and identity attack-path validation in production.
- Preis
- From $25,000 / 12 months on AWS Marketplace
- Gratisplan
- Nein
- Autonomie
- Autonomous
- Integrationen
- None named on the pages we opened
Punkte im Detail77
- Fit for the job28/30
- Autonomy17/20
- Controls11/15
- Integrations4/15
- Access8/10
- Evidence9/10
Platz 3
Aikido77
Engineering teams that want AppSec findings turned into pull requests, plus proof of what is exploitable.
- Preis
- Free
- Gratisplan
- Ja
- Autonomie
- Autonomous
- Integrationen
- Jira, Linear, Drata
Punkte im Detail77
- Fit for the job21/30
- Autonomy17/20
- Controls11/15
- Integrations9/15
- Access10/10
- Evidence9/10
Platz 4
XBOW74
Security teams that want continuous, proof-of-exploit testing of web apps and APIs.
- Preis
- Not published
- Gratisplan
- Nein
- Autonomie
- Autonomous
- Integrationen
- None named on the pages we opened
Punkte im Detail74
- Fit for the job29/30
- Autonomy17/20
- Controls11/15
- Integrations4/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Platz 5
Pentera72
Enterprises that want validated attack paths and a retest after remediation.
- Preis
- Not published
- Gratisplan
- Nein
- Autonomie
- Autonomous
- Integrationen
- None named on the pages we opened
Punkte im Detail72
- Fit for the job27/30
- Autonomy17/20
- Controls11/15
- Integrations4/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Platz 6
RunSybil71
Product teams that want pentest-style findings on each deployment instead of an annual test.
- Preis
- Not published
- Gratisplan
- Nein
- Autonomie
- Autonomous
- Integrationen
- None named on the pages we opened
Punkte im Detail71
- Fit for the job26/30
- Autonomy17/20
- Controls11/15
- Integrations4/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Platz 7
Prophet Security66
SOCs that want every alert investigated and still want a human check on malicious verdicts.
- Preis
- Not published
- Gratisplan
- Nein
- Autonomie
- Semi-autonomous
- Integrationen
- None named on the pages we opened
Punkte im Detail66
- Fit for the job24/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations4/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Platz 8
Torq65
Security operations teams that want agentic response with an override still available.
- Preis
- Not published
- Gratisplan
- Nein
- Autonomie
- Semi-autonomous
- Integrationen
- None named on the pages we opened
Punkte im Detail65
- Fit for the job23/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations4/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Platz 9
Intezer64
Enterprise SOCs that want forensic triage of the full alert queue.
- Preis
- Not published
- Gratisplan
- Nein
- Autonomie
- Semi-autonomous
- Integrationen
- None named on the pages we opened
Punkte im Detail64
- Fit for the job22/30
- Autonomy13/20
- Controls12/15
- Integrations4/15
- Access4/10
- Evidence9/10
Preise, Funktionen und Kurzprofile
1
Dropzone AI
SOC teams that want machine-scale alert investigation and hunting without replacing analysts.
Dropzone AI is an agentic SOC platform whose AI SOC Analyst investigates alerts across the existing tool stack and whose AI Threat Hunter runs hypothesis-driven hunts. The site says it ships with 90-plus integrations across SIEM, EDR, cloud, identity, and email, and that analysts set strategy and authorize containment.
- Preis
- Not published
- The homepage offers a self-guided demo and does not list a price. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funktionen
- Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, Microsoft Defender, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Okta, Google Workspace, Panther. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
Preis und Funktionen von Dropzone AI/Alternativen zu Dropzone AI
2
Horizon3.ai NodeZero
Teams that want continuous internal, cloud, and identity attack-path validation in production.
Horizon3.ai's NodeZero autonomously runs real attack techniques in production without agents, then shows how an attacker would move and what to fix. The company says NodeZero is not a scanner and that it has recorded zero downtime across its production tests.
- Preis
- From $25,000 / 12 months on AWS Marketplace
- horizon3.ai does not list a price. AWS Marketplace lists a 12-month NodeZero Core package for 500 assets at $25,000, Pro at $32,500, and Elite at $42,500. Flex, a one-time test of 1,000 assets, is $15,000. A comment on the linked r/Pentesting thread says standard-tier MSRP is $50 per asset and Flex is $15 per asset, which matches that list math, but the contract prices above are the ones on the marketplace page. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funktionen
- None named on the pages we opened. Sold to run the job rather than wait for a prompt on every step. Keep a way to stop it before it reaches a customer, a candidate, or a filing.
Was Nutzer sagen
Ein Kommentar auf r/Pentesting beschreibt die Standardstufe von NodeZero als fortlaufende Tests zum Preis pro Asset, mit Verhandlungsspielraum.
Auf r/cybersecurity nannte ein NodeZero-Nutzer es enttäuschend, schwach bei Web-Apps und laut, sobald es einen Halt hatte. Sie behandeln es als Ergänzung zu einem menschlichen Tester.
“I'd disagree, I was a bit disappointed with NodeZero. A comparison to Burp isn't even realistic though, since NZ doesn't have web app capabilities at this point (unless it's a public PoC for a particular software).”
Reddit · u/MouseMajor1337“H3's standard tier MSRP is $50 per asset, but that price can be negotiated. Standard tier gets you continuous (unlimited) testing for all Assets along with other features.”
Reddit · u/FrerBear
Preis und Funktionen von Horizon3.ai NodeZero/Alternativen zu Horizon3.ai NodeZero
3
Aikido
Engineering teams that want AppSec findings turned into pull requests, plus proof of what is exploitable.
Aikido is a developer security platform that scans code, dependencies, secrets, and cloud, and runs agents that detect issues, open fix pull requests, deploy to staging, and verify the fix. Its Attack product autonomously attacks running applications, APIs, and infrastructure to prove what is exploitable.
- Preis
- Free
- The Developer plan is $0 forever, includes 2 users, and requires no credit card. Limits on that plan include 10 repos, 2 container images, 1 domain, 1 cloud account, 10 AI AutoFixes a month, and 250,000 protected requests a month. The Basic card is labeled 300/month and the Pro and Advanced cards are labeled 600/month, each including 10 users; the currency symbol did not appear beside those three figures in the page text. The same page lists a typical pentest at $4,000 per assessment. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funktionen
- Jira, Linear, Drata, Vanta. Sold to run the job rather than wait for a prompt on every step. Keep a way to stop it before it reaches a customer, a candidate, or a filing.
4
XBOW
Security teams that want continuous, proof-of-exploit testing of web apps and APIs.
XBOW is an autonomous offensive security platform that explores applications and APIs, chains vulnerabilities into working attacks, and proves exploitability before a finding reaches the team. The company says more than 150 security teams use it, and that it was the first autonomous system to rank number one on HackerOne in June 2025.
- Preis
- Not published
- The pricing page says pricing is scoped to the environment and is usage-based, scaling with coverage rather than a fixed annual engagement. No dollar amount is listed. XBOW says it is also sold through AWS, Google, Oracle, and Microsoft marketplaces. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funktionen
- None named on the pages we opened. Sold to run the job rather than wait for a prompt on every step. Keep a way to stop it before it reaches a customer, a candidate, or a filing.
Was Nutzer sagen
Auf r/Pentesting stellt ein Kommentar XBOW zu Tools, die die laufende Anwendung angreifen, was er Code-Scannern vorzieht, die als Pentest verkauft werden.
Der Thread ist skeptisch gegenüber der Kategorie. Er beschreibt keinen benannten XBOW-Fehlschlag.
“You should be choosing a tool that actually tests in runtime. Aka software like xbow, mindfort, etc.”
Reddit · u/danielrabinovich
5
Pentera
Enterprises that want validated attack paths and a retest after remediation.
Pentera is an exposure-validation platform that emulates real attacks in live production, prioritizes what is exploitable, and can orchestrate remediation and retest the fix. It says it covers internal networks, external assets, cloud, and hybrid environments and supports all five stages of continuous threat exposure management.
- Preis
- Not published
- No price is shown on the homepage that loaded. The page asks visitors to request a personalized demo. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funktionen
- None named on the pages we opened. Sold to run the job rather than wait for a prompt on every step. Keep a way to stop it before it reaches a customer, a candidate, or a filing.
6
RunSybil
Product teams that want pentest-style findings on each deployment instead of an annual test.
RunSybil is an AI offensive-security platform that tests applications and infrastructure by reasoning about the system the way a human researcher would, on every deployment. It says it covers code, APIs, cloud, and infrastructure, including business-logic and multi-tenant issues, and that it validates whether exposures are actually exploitable.
- Preis
- Not published
- The homepage says Sybil replaces bug bounties and point-in-time pentests with predictable cost. No price or plan is listed. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funktionen
- None named on the pages we opened. Sold to run the job rather than wait for a prompt on every step. Keep a way to stop it before it reaches a customer, a candidate, or a filing.
7
Prophet Security
SOCs that want every alert investigated and still want a human check on malicious verdicts.
Prophet AI investigates alerts, hunts threats, and ships tuned or new detections that are backtested for approval. Response can run through scoped agent actions autonomously or with a sign-off, and a human Watchtower reviews malicious determinations around the clock.
- Preis
- Not published
- The homepage does not list a price. It says the product deploys as a dedicated single-tenant environment with a bring-your-own-key option. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funktionen
- None named on the pages we opened. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
Preis und Funktionen von Prophet Security/Alternativen zu Prophet Security
8
Torq
Security operations teams that want agentic response with an override still available.
Torq's AI SOC platform triages events, investigates cases with specialized agents, and can respond either autonomously or with a human in the loop. Its Socrates agent is described as natural-language agentic AI that remediates critical threats, and every decision is written to a context model with an audit trail.
- Preis
- Not published
- The homepage does not list a price. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funktionen
- None named on the pages we opened. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
9
Intezer
Enterprise SOCs that want forensic triage of the full alert queue.
Intezer's AI SOC triages, investigates, and can respond to alerts, including low-severity ones, using endpoint forensics, memory analysis, and reverse engineering alongside AI models. The site says it resolves more than 98 percent of false positives in under a minute and prices by endpoint rather than by alert volume.
- Preis
- Not published
- The homepage says pricing is endpoint-based and predictable, with no volume fees. No dollar amount or plan card is shown. Last checked 5 October 2026.
- Funktionen
- None named on the pages we opened. It can carry a stretch of the work, then wait. A person still approves anything that leaves the building.
Was ist ein KI-Agent?
KI-Pentest sucht ausnutzbare Lücken und lässt den Beleg da. XBOW und Pentera sind das Produkt. Der NodeZero-Preis, den wir nennen, steht im AWS Marketplace.
Wie diese Liste aufgebaut ist
Oben auf dieser Liste stehen Dropzone AI, Horizon3.ai NodeZero, Aikido. Die Reihenfolge folgt der veröffentlichten Punktzahl, nicht einer Anzeige.
Was Sie vergleichen sollten
Sehen Sie auf die Aufgabe, den Einstiegspreis und ob ein Mensch das Ergebnis noch freigibt.
- Eine Aufgabe, die das Produkt wirklich erledigt
- Ein veröffentlichter Preis, ein Gratisplan oder ein klar genannter individueller Preis
- Eine Prüfung, bevor die Arbeit den Kunden erreicht
Wofür diese Software da ist
Sie lohnt sich, wenn derselbe Schritt sich wiederholt. Die Entscheidung bleibt bei einem Menschen.
- Den Einstiegspreis vor einer Demo sehen
- Produkte für diese Aufgabe vergleichen, nicht ein allgemeines Chatfenster
- Die Produktseite für die längeren Notizen öffnen
Für wen diese Liste ist
Für Leute, die die Aufgabe schon kennen und die passenden Produkte wollen, mit Datum an den Preisen.
Veröffentlichte Einstiegspreise
Einstiegszahlen, die wir prüfen konnten: Dropzone AI (Not published), Horizon3.ai NodeZero (From $25,000 / 12 months on AWS Marketplace), Aikido (Free). Zuletzt geprüft am 5. Oktober 2026.
Wie Sie wählen
Zuerst die Aufgabe. Dann lesen Sie, für wen das Produkt ist und ob Sie ohne Verkaufsgespräch starten können.
Verwandte Kategorien
Nachbaraufgaben haben eine eigene Liste.
Fragen
Bewertungsmethode
Geprüft 5 October 2026
Jedes Produkt wird mit denselben sechs Teilen von 100 bewertet. Der Platz folgt der Summe, dann der Passung, dann dem Namen. Die ganze Methode lesen.